Cut and Paste: The Mobile Image From Watteau to Robert

This dissertation takes a mode of production — cutting-and-pasting in its most literal and more abstract forms — as a tool for thinking anew about eighteenth-century French art and visual culture in two key ways. The first is to orient art historians’ focus away from spaces of reception (prioritize...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pullins, David
Other Authors: Lajer-Burcharth, Ewa
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Harvard University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493587
id ndltd-harvard.edu-oai-dash.harvard.edu-1-33493587
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-harvard.edu-oai-dash.harvard.edu-1-334935872017-07-27T15:52:21ZCut and Paste: The Mobile Image From Watteau to RobertPullins, DavidArt HistoryThis dissertation takes a mode of production — cutting-and-pasting in its most literal and more abstract forms — as a tool for thinking anew about eighteenth-century French art and visual culture in two key ways. The first is to orient art historians’ focus away from spaces of reception (prioritized in the field since the logocentric discourse established by academicians and critics in the seventeenth century) towards spaces of production (typically obfuscated by the same discourse). This is to undress painting of many of the ideologically-driven, highly wrought terms that elevated it from a mechanical to a liberal art in France between roughly 1690 and 1790. Cutting-and-pasting also provides a means of addressing current art historical concerns about “transmediality” (for which eighteenth-century France and its “integrative interiors” have been seen as particularly relevant) that nonetheless remains historically responsible about the medium-specificity so central to the guild-based culture that produced these objects. In order to lodge these issues at the heart of the study of eighteenth-century art, the examples of Antoine Watteau, Jean-Baptiste Oudry, François Boucher and Hubert Robert are explored in greatest depth and situated against a much broader cast of actors that includes print-makers, publishers, anonymous studio assistants, architects and experts in porcelain, textiles, marquetry and metalwork. In this dissertation’s conclusion, the ghost of the decorative in works that would become known as “rococo painting” is addressed in order to posit new insight into how divisions that were being actively constructed in the eighteenth century between fine and decorative, liberal and mechanical — and, indeed, works on canvas versus all other media — do not necessarily serve art historians well in their understanding of eighteenth-century French painting.History of Art and ArchitectureLajer-Burcharth, Ewa2017-07-25T14:44:30Z2016-052016-05-162016Thesis or Dissertationtextapplication/pdfPullins, David. 2016. Cut and Paste: The Mobile Image From Watteau to Robert. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:334935870000-0003-0971-4512enembargoedhttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAAHarvard University
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Art History
spellingShingle Art History
Pullins, David
Cut and Paste: The Mobile Image From Watteau to Robert
description This dissertation takes a mode of production — cutting-and-pasting in its most literal and more abstract forms — as a tool for thinking anew about eighteenth-century French art and visual culture in two key ways. The first is to orient art historians’ focus away from spaces of reception (prioritized in the field since the logocentric discourse established by academicians and critics in the seventeenth century) towards spaces of production (typically obfuscated by the same discourse). This is to undress painting of many of the ideologically-driven, highly wrought terms that elevated it from a mechanical to a liberal art in France between roughly 1690 and 1790. Cutting-and-pasting also provides a means of addressing current art historical concerns about “transmediality” (for which eighteenth-century France and its “integrative interiors” have been seen as particularly relevant) that nonetheless remains historically responsible about the medium-specificity so central to the guild-based culture that produced these objects. In order to lodge these issues at the heart of the study of eighteenth-century art, the examples of Antoine Watteau, Jean-Baptiste Oudry, François Boucher and Hubert Robert are explored in greatest depth and situated against a much broader cast of actors that includes print-makers, publishers, anonymous studio assistants, architects and experts in porcelain, textiles, marquetry and metalwork. In this dissertation’s conclusion, the ghost of the decorative in works that would become known as “rococo painting” is addressed in order to posit new insight into how divisions that were being actively constructed in the eighteenth century between fine and decorative, liberal and mechanical — and, indeed, works on canvas versus all other media — do not necessarily serve art historians well in their understanding of eighteenth-century French painting. === History of Art and Architecture
author2 Lajer-Burcharth, Ewa
author_facet Lajer-Burcharth, Ewa
Pullins, David
author Pullins, David
author_sort Pullins, David
title Cut and Paste: The Mobile Image From Watteau to Robert
title_short Cut and Paste: The Mobile Image From Watteau to Robert
title_full Cut and Paste: The Mobile Image From Watteau to Robert
title_fullStr Cut and Paste: The Mobile Image From Watteau to Robert
title_full_unstemmed Cut and Paste: The Mobile Image From Watteau to Robert
title_sort cut and paste: the mobile image from watteau to robert
publisher Harvard University
publishDate 2017
url http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493587
work_keys_str_mv AT pullinsdavid cutandpastethemobileimagefromwatteautorobert
_version_ 1718507438873772032