THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARY CONSORTIA: A STUDY OF PERCEPTIONS

This survey study of the directors of academic libraries that participate in academic library consortia was conducted to provide a description of their roles in these cooperatives as well as to assess the impact participation has on their libraries and their own work. The total identifiable populati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: BAUGHMAN, STEVEN ALAN.
Format: Others
Subjects:
Online Access: http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/lib/digcoll/etd/3085984
id ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_75470
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_754702019-07-01T04:10:25Z THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARY CONSORTIA: A STUDY OF PERCEPTIONS BAUGHMAN, STEVEN ALAN. Florida State University Text 142 p. This survey study of the directors of academic libraries that participate in academic library consortia was conducted to provide a description of their roles in these cooperatives as well as to assess the impact participation has on their libraries and their own work. The total identifiable population of consortium participating academic library administrators was polled. Dependent variables included: areas of benefit resulting from consortium participation, areas of problems and costs of participation, and the effects of budget constraints. Independent variables included sizes and types of institutions, control status of institution, consortium organization, and presence of a consortium director. Findings indicated that: (1) Consortium governance is still the province of the library administrators. It requires commitments of their time but is not viewed as burdensome. Presence of a consortium director made no difference in perceptions of time commitment. (2) The major area of benefit identified is interlibrary loan. Other services seen to benefit include: reference and circulation. Presence of a consortium director increases perceptions of benefit. (3) Areas of cost associated with consortium activity were not preceived as heavy. The most cited area was the increased workload for the administrators themselves. Presence of a consortium director increases perceived cost. (4) No major problem areas were identified. The most often cited area was insufficient consortium funding. Fewer problems are seen when a consortium director is present. (5) Management skills identified as more important for the consortium setting included the communication skills. (6) Budgetary constraints were perceived as an impetus towards increased cooperation. On campus use only. Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 46-01, Section: A, page: 0008. Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1984. Library Science http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/lib/digcoll/etd/3085984 Dissertation Abstracts International AAI8505284 3085984 FSDT3085984 fsu:75470 http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A75470/datastream/TN/view/THE%20ROLE%20OF%20ACADEMIC%20LIBRARY%20ADMINISTRATORS%20IN%20ACADEMIC%20LIBRARY%20CONSORTIA%3A%20A%20STUDY%20OF%20PERCEPTIONS.jpg
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Library Science
spellingShingle Library Science
THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARY CONSORTIA: A STUDY OF PERCEPTIONS
description This survey study of the directors of academic libraries that participate in academic library consortia was conducted to provide a description of their roles in these cooperatives as well as to assess the impact participation has on their libraries and their own work. The total identifiable population of consortium participating academic library administrators was polled. === Dependent variables included: areas of benefit resulting from consortium participation, areas of problems and costs of participation, and the effects of budget constraints. Independent variables included sizes and types of institutions, control status of institution, consortium organization, and presence of a consortium director. === Findings indicated that: (1) Consortium governance is still the province of the library administrators. It requires commitments of their time but is not viewed as burdensome. Presence of a consortium director made no difference in perceptions of time commitment. (2) The major area of benefit identified is interlibrary loan. Other services seen to benefit include: reference and circulation. Presence of a consortium director increases perceptions of benefit. (3) Areas of cost associated with consortium activity were not preceived as heavy. The most cited area was the increased workload for the administrators themselves. Presence of a consortium director increases perceived cost. (4) No major problem areas were identified. The most often cited area was insufficient consortium funding. Fewer problems are seen when a consortium director is present. (5) Management skills identified as more important for the consortium setting included the communication skills. (6) Budgetary constraints were perceived as an impetus towards increased cooperation. === Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 46-01, Section: A, page: 0008. === Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 1984.
author2 BAUGHMAN, STEVEN ALAN.
author_facet BAUGHMAN, STEVEN ALAN.
title THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARY CONSORTIA: A STUDY OF PERCEPTIONS
title_short THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARY CONSORTIA: A STUDY OF PERCEPTIONS
title_full THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARY CONSORTIA: A STUDY OF PERCEPTIONS
title_fullStr THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARY CONSORTIA: A STUDY OF PERCEPTIONS
title_full_unstemmed THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC LIBRARY ADMINISTRATORS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARY CONSORTIA: A STUDY OF PERCEPTIONS
title_sort role of academic library administrators in academic library consortia: a study of perceptions
url http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/lib/digcoll/etd/3085984
_version_ 1719215782540345344