On Inactivity in the Lab

In this dissertation I explorer the role of inactivity in the social science laboratory, looking at how it affects subjects and their behavior, and I look into some alternatives. In chapter 3, I look at how experimenter imposed activity affects subject behavior in three simpl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Jensenius, John Spaulding (authoraut)
Format: Others
Language:English
English
Published: Florida State University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_2016SP_JenseniusIII_fsu_0071E_13215
id ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_360382
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_3603822020-06-24T03:07:17Z On Inactivity in the Lab Jensenius, John Spaulding (authoraut) Isaac, R. Mark (Robert Mark) (professor directing dissertation) Blay, Allen D. (Allen Dennis) (university representative) Cooper, David J. (committee member) Pevnitskaya, Svetlana A. (committee member) Florida State University (degree granting institution) College of Social Sciences and Public Policy (degree granting college) Department of Economics (degree granting department) Text text Florida State University Florida State University English eng 1 online resource (126 pages) computer application/pdf In this dissertation I explorer the role of inactivity in the social science laboratory, looking at how it affects subjects and their behavior, and I look into some alternatives. In chapter 3, I look at how experimenter imposed activity affects subject behavior in three simple economic environments: a Dictator Game, a Voluntary Contributions Public Good, and a Gamble Selection task. I find very little to no change in behavior in any of the environments as a result of the inactivity. In chapter 4, I look at the same three economic environments, but manipulate the source of the inactivity so that it is now partially the result of other subjects' actions. In this situation, I find some evidence that inactivity affects subject behavior in the Dictator Game, and strong evidence that it affects behavior in the Public Goods environment, but no evidence that it effects risk preferences. In Chapter 5, I use a novel setup to take a direct measure of the value subjects have for inactivity. I find that subjects are willing to forgo positive wages to avoid inactivity. In Chapter 6, I look at possible alternatives to inactivity and elicit subjects' valuations of each activity across different lengths of time. I identify two activities whose value I cannot show to be significantly different from zero, and whose value does not change significantly across different lengths of time. A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Economics in partial fulfillment of the Doctor of Philosophy. Spring Semester 2016. March 29, 2016. Experimental Economics, Inactivity, Methodology Includes bibliographical references. R. Mark Isaac, Professor Directing Dissertation; Allen Blay, University Representative; David J. Cooper, Committee Member; Svetlana Pevnitskaya, Committee Member. Economics FSU_2016SP_JenseniusIII_fsu_0071E_13215 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_2016SP_JenseniusIII_fsu_0071E_13215 This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A360382/datastream/TN/view/On%20Inactivity%20in%20the%20Lab.jpg
collection NDLTD
language English
English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Economics
spellingShingle Economics
On Inactivity in the Lab
description In this dissertation I explorer the role of inactivity in the social science laboratory, looking at how it affects subjects and their behavior, and I look into some alternatives. In chapter 3, I look at how experimenter imposed activity affects subject behavior in three simple economic environments: a Dictator Game, a Voluntary Contributions Public Good, and a Gamble Selection task. I find very little to no change in behavior in any of the environments as a result of the inactivity. In chapter 4, I look at the same three economic environments, but manipulate the source of the inactivity so that it is now partially the result of other subjects' actions. In this situation, I find some evidence that inactivity affects subject behavior in the Dictator Game, and strong evidence that it affects behavior in the Public Goods environment, but no evidence that it effects risk preferences. In Chapter 5, I use a novel setup to take a direct measure of the value subjects have for inactivity. I find that subjects are willing to forgo positive wages to avoid inactivity. In Chapter 6, I look at possible alternatives to inactivity and elicit subjects' valuations of each activity across different lengths of time. I identify two activities whose value I cannot show to be significantly different from zero, and whose value does not change significantly across different lengths of time. === A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Economics in partial fulfillment of the Doctor of Philosophy. === Spring Semester 2016. === March 29, 2016. === Experimental Economics, Inactivity, Methodology === Includes bibliographical references. === R. Mark Isaac, Professor Directing Dissertation; Allen Blay, University Representative; David J. Cooper, Committee Member; Svetlana Pevnitskaya, Committee Member.
author2 Jensenius, John Spaulding (authoraut)
author_facet Jensenius, John Spaulding (authoraut)
title On Inactivity in the Lab
title_short On Inactivity in the Lab
title_full On Inactivity in the Lab
title_fullStr On Inactivity in the Lab
title_full_unstemmed On Inactivity in the Lab
title_sort on inactivity in the lab
publisher Florida State University
url http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_2016SP_JenseniusIII_fsu_0071E_13215
_version_ 1719323193752158208