Implicit Spatial Cues in Language

Previous studies have found interactions between the meaning of a word and the spatial position of the word (Barsalou, 2008; Zwaan and Yaxley, 2003). Some studies find that words or sentences with a directional component facilitate detection toward the congruent spatial direction (e.g., Šetić &...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Fox, Melissa R. (authoraut)
Format: Others
Language:English
English
Published: Florida State University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-9601
id ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_253072
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_2530722020-06-18T03:08:03Z Implicit Spatial Cues in Language Fox, Melissa R. (authoraut) Kaschak, Michael P. (professor directing thesis) Boot, Walter Richard (committee member) Borovsky, Arielle A. (Arielle Ann) (committee member) Florida State University (degree granting institution) College of Arts and Sciences (degree granting college) Department of Psychology (degree granting department) Text text Florida State University Florida State University English eng 1 online resource (28 pages) computer application/pdf Previous studies have found interactions between the meaning of a word and the spatial position of the word (Barsalou, 2008; Zwaan and Yaxley, 2003). Some studies find that words or sentences with a directional component facilitate detection toward the congruent spatial direction (e.g., Šetić & Domijan, 2007; Dils & Boroditsky, 2007; Dils & Boroditsky, 2010; Pecher et al; 2010). For instance, the word "jump" would cue toward the top of a screen. Other studies find the opposite effect, where words with implicit spatial meaning show an interference effect (e.g., Bergen et al, 2007; Estes et al, 2008; Dils & Boroditsky, 2010). In these cases the word "jump" would result in faster reaction times to stimuli in the bottom of the screen. This experiment attempts to answer this controversy by looking at temporal effects. These differences might be due to inhibition of return (Posner & Cohen, 1984). If that is the case, you would expect to see a timeline where there is a facilitation effect followed by interference. Results of the study show no effect of time, however there were strong item effects. Most sentences consistently showed either a facilitation or inhabitation effect across all times. This suggests that these effects are modulated by the items that are used. A Thesis submitted to the Department of Psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Summer Semester 2015. July 16, 2015. Language, Spatial Includes bibliographical references. Michael Kaschak, Professor Directing Thesis; Walter Boot, Committee Member; Arielle Borovsky, Committee Member. Cognitive psychology FSU_migr_etd-9601 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-9601 This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A253072/datastream/TN/view/Implicit%20Spatial%20Cues%20in%20Language.jpg
collection NDLTD
language English
English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Cognitive psychology
spellingShingle Cognitive psychology
Implicit Spatial Cues in Language
description Previous studies have found interactions between the meaning of a word and the spatial position of the word (Barsalou, 2008; Zwaan and Yaxley, 2003). Some studies find that words or sentences with a directional component facilitate detection toward the congruent spatial direction (e.g., Šetić & Domijan, 2007; Dils & Boroditsky, 2007; Dils & Boroditsky, 2010; Pecher et al; 2010). For instance, the word "jump" would cue toward the top of a screen. Other studies find the opposite effect, where words with implicit spatial meaning show an interference effect (e.g., Bergen et al, 2007; Estes et al, 2008; Dils & Boroditsky, 2010). In these cases the word "jump" would result in faster reaction times to stimuli in the bottom of the screen. This experiment attempts to answer this controversy by looking at temporal effects. These differences might be due to inhibition of return (Posner & Cohen, 1984). If that is the case, you would expect to see a timeline where there is a facilitation effect followed by interference. Results of the study show no effect of time, however there were strong item effects. Most sentences consistently showed either a facilitation or inhabitation effect across all times. This suggests that these effects are modulated by the items that are used. === A Thesis submitted to the Department of Psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. === Summer Semester 2015. === July 16, 2015. === Language, Spatial === Includes bibliographical references. === Michael Kaschak, Professor Directing Thesis; Walter Boot, Committee Member; Arielle Borovsky, Committee Member.
author2 Fox, Melissa R. (authoraut)
author_facet Fox, Melissa R. (authoraut)
title Implicit Spatial Cues in Language
title_short Implicit Spatial Cues in Language
title_full Implicit Spatial Cues in Language
title_fullStr Implicit Spatial Cues in Language
title_full_unstemmed Implicit Spatial Cues in Language
title_sort implicit spatial cues in language
publisher Florida State University
url http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-9601
_version_ 1719320856820187136