Increasing Feedback Specificity in the Choral Rehearsal: Assessing and Enhancing Feedback of Teacher Conductors Through Analysis and Training

The purpose of the present study was: (1) to determine graduate student conductors' and teacher conductors' degree of feedback specificity, and ratio of positive to negative feedback; (2) to determine the feasibility of the Choral Feedback Assessment Form (CFAF) as a feedback measurement t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Biddlecombe, Thomas (Tucker) (authoraut)
Format: Others
Language:English
English
Published: Florida State University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-4720
id ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_182771
record_format oai_dc
collection NDLTD
language English
English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Music
spellingShingle Music
Increasing Feedback Specificity in the Choral Rehearsal: Assessing and Enhancing Feedback of Teacher Conductors Through Analysis and Training
description The purpose of the present study was: (1) to determine graduate student conductors' and teacher conductors' degree of feedback specificity, and ratio of positive to negative feedback; (2) to determine the feasibility of the Choral Feedback Assessment Form (CFAF) as a feedback measurement tool; and (3) to examine the effectiveness of the CFAF as an intervention tool to increase participants' use of feedback specificity. Participants in the descriptive phase of this study (N = 52) were professional choral directors (n = 17), and graduate choral conducting students (n = 35) in their second year of study at a large Southeastern university. Participants' rehearsal videotapes were analyzed using the CFAF, resulting in an approval/disapproval ratio of 2:1 for both graduate student and teacher conductors, well below the 4:1 ratio indicated as most effective by extant research. Findings also revealed that participants' specificity in negative feedback was high, while their specificity in positive feedback was disproportionately low. Overall reliability of the CFAF was calculated at .82. Participants in the experimental phase of this study (N = 32) were professional choral directors at large high school music programs in Florida (n = 17), and graduate choral conducting students in their second year of study at a large Southeastern university (n = 15). Participants were observed and assessed according to CFAF categories over the course of three choral rehearsals. Intermittent intervention sessions-- intended to increase participants' feedback specificity--included explanation of the CFAF and videotape analyses. Results revealed significant increases in participants' use of specific positive feedback, and significant decreases in their use of nonspecific negative feedback. Teacher conductors also exhibited significant increases in their use of high magnitude positive feedback, while graduate student conductors exhibited significant increases in their use of specific negative feedback. Additional results revealed participant approval/disapproval ratios increased from 2:1 to 3:1 from pretest to posttest. Participants reported the CFAF was effective in increasing their feedback specificity, and their choir members' performance and attitudes improved when feedback became more specific. Participants also reported that they continued their efforts to maintain feedback specificity after the investigation period had ended. Finally, participants shared their personal experiences with high magnitude and anomalistic feedback. Implications for teacher training are discussed, as well as suggestions for further research. === A Dissertation submitted to the College of Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. === Summer Semester, 2012. === June 1, 2012. === Biddlecombe, Choral, Conductors, Feedback, Reinforcement, Specificity === Includes bibliographical references. === Alice-Ann Darrow, Professor Co-Directing Dissertation; André Thomas, Professor Co-Directing Dissertation; Wanda Brister-Rachwal, University Representative; Kevin Fenton, Committee Member; Clifford K. Madsen, Committee Member.
author2 Biddlecombe, Thomas (Tucker) (authoraut)
author_facet Biddlecombe, Thomas (Tucker) (authoraut)
title Increasing Feedback Specificity in the Choral Rehearsal: Assessing and Enhancing Feedback of Teacher Conductors Through Analysis and Training
title_short Increasing Feedback Specificity in the Choral Rehearsal: Assessing and Enhancing Feedback of Teacher Conductors Through Analysis and Training
title_full Increasing Feedback Specificity in the Choral Rehearsal: Assessing and Enhancing Feedback of Teacher Conductors Through Analysis and Training
title_fullStr Increasing Feedback Specificity in the Choral Rehearsal: Assessing and Enhancing Feedback of Teacher Conductors Through Analysis and Training
title_full_unstemmed Increasing Feedback Specificity in the Choral Rehearsal: Assessing and Enhancing Feedback of Teacher Conductors Through Analysis and Training
title_sort increasing feedback specificity in the choral rehearsal: assessing and enhancing feedback of teacher conductors through analysis and training
publisher Florida State University
url http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-4720
_version_ 1719319438885388288
spelling ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_1827712020-06-13T03:08:57Z Increasing Feedback Specificity in the Choral Rehearsal: Assessing and Enhancing Feedback of Teacher Conductors Through Analysis and Training Biddlecombe, Thomas (Tucker) (authoraut) Darrow, Alice-Ann (professor co-directing dissertation) Thomas, André (professor co-directing dissertation) Brister-Rachwal, Wanda (university representative) Fenton, Kevin (committee member) Madsen, Clifford K. (committee member) College of Music (degree granting department) Florida State University (degree granting institution) Text text Florida State University Florida State University English eng 1 online resource computer application/pdf The purpose of the present study was: (1) to determine graduate student conductors' and teacher conductors' degree of feedback specificity, and ratio of positive to negative feedback; (2) to determine the feasibility of the Choral Feedback Assessment Form (CFAF) as a feedback measurement tool; and (3) to examine the effectiveness of the CFAF as an intervention tool to increase participants' use of feedback specificity. Participants in the descriptive phase of this study (N = 52) were professional choral directors (n = 17), and graduate choral conducting students (n = 35) in their second year of study at a large Southeastern university. Participants' rehearsal videotapes were analyzed using the CFAF, resulting in an approval/disapproval ratio of 2:1 for both graduate student and teacher conductors, well below the 4:1 ratio indicated as most effective by extant research. Findings also revealed that participants' specificity in negative feedback was high, while their specificity in positive feedback was disproportionately low. Overall reliability of the CFAF was calculated at .82. Participants in the experimental phase of this study (N = 32) were professional choral directors at large high school music programs in Florida (n = 17), and graduate choral conducting students in their second year of study at a large Southeastern university (n = 15). Participants were observed and assessed according to CFAF categories over the course of three choral rehearsals. Intermittent intervention sessions-- intended to increase participants' feedback specificity--included explanation of the CFAF and videotape analyses. Results revealed significant increases in participants' use of specific positive feedback, and significant decreases in their use of nonspecific negative feedback. Teacher conductors also exhibited significant increases in their use of high magnitude positive feedback, while graduate student conductors exhibited significant increases in their use of specific negative feedback. Additional results revealed participant approval/disapproval ratios increased from 2:1 to 3:1 from pretest to posttest. Participants reported the CFAF was effective in increasing their feedback specificity, and their choir members' performance and attitudes improved when feedback became more specific. Participants also reported that they continued their efforts to maintain feedback specificity after the investigation period had ended. Finally, participants shared their personal experiences with high magnitude and anomalistic feedback. Implications for teacher training are discussed, as well as suggestions for further research. A Dissertation submitted to the College of Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Summer Semester, 2012. June 1, 2012. Biddlecombe, Choral, Conductors, Feedback, Reinforcement, Specificity Includes bibliographical references. Alice-Ann Darrow, Professor Co-Directing Dissertation; André Thomas, Professor Co-Directing Dissertation; Wanda Brister-Rachwal, University Representative; Kevin Fenton, Committee Member; Clifford K. Madsen, Committee Member. Music FSU_migr_etd-4720 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-4720 This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A182771/datastream/TN/view/Increasing%20Feedback%20Specificity%20in%20the%20Choral%20Rehearsal.jpg