The Other Heifer
This thesis will work to illuminate the significant similarities between Johann Georg Hamann and Søren Kierkegaard; a relationship that is often referred but rarely attended to. The lines of correspondence are both hidden and pronounced in their early work—Hamann in Socratic Memorabilia and Kierkega...
Other Authors: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Florida State University
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-4485 |
id |
ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_182607 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_1826072020-06-13T03:08:34Z The Other Heifer Feddon, Dustin Ryan (authoraut) Kangas, David (professor directing thesis) Kavka, Martin (committee member) Twiss, Sumner (committee member) Department of Religion (degree granting department) Florida State University (degree granting institution) Text text Florida State University Florida State University English eng 1 online resource computer application/pdf This thesis will work to illuminate the significant similarities between Johann Georg Hamann and Søren Kierkegaard; a relationship that is often referred but rarely attended to. The lines of correspondence are both hidden and pronounced in their early work—Hamann in Socratic Memorabilia and Kierkegaard in the Concept of Irony. Peculiarly, both Hamann and Kierkegaard employ the ambiguous figure of Socrates in order to impede the rush of philosophy towards absolute knowledge. This is to say that the two writers discern a move towards a world ordering morality that tramples over the perspective of the subject. Hamann and Kierkegaard will counter this move towards the grounding of philosophy into a universal system by re-casting Socrates in an ambiguous light; a mediating figure strung between ideality and actuality. Hamann and Kierkegaard both use Socrates in order to open religious dimensions in the currents of modern philosophy. Hamann and Kierkegaard share common foundations (Lutheranism), common objectives (elevating experience over knowledge), and common vehicles in their argumentation (Socrates and Socratic ignorance). A Thesis submitted to the Department of Religion in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Summer Semester, 2004. April 7, 2004. Kierkegaard, Hamann, Socrates, Concept of Irony, Religion, Subjectivity Includes bibliographical references. David Kangas, Professor Directing Thesis; Martin Kavka, Committee Member; Sumner Twiss, Committee Member. Religion FSU_migr_etd-4485 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-4485 This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A182607/datastream/TN/view/Other%20Heifer.jpg |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Religion |
spellingShingle |
Religion The Other Heifer |
description |
This thesis will work to illuminate the significant similarities between Johann Georg Hamann and Søren Kierkegaard; a relationship that is often referred but rarely attended to. The lines of correspondence are both hidden and pronounced in their early work—Hamann in Socratic Memorabilia and Kierkegaard in the Concept of Irony. Peculiarly, both Hamann and Kierkegaard employ the ambiguous figure of Socrates in order to impede the rush of philosophy towards absolute knowledge. This is to say that the two writers discern a move towards a world ordering morality that tramples over the perspective of the subject. Hamann and Kierkegaard will counter this move towards the grounding of philosophy into a universal system by re-casting Socrates in an ambiguous light; a mediating figure strung between ideality and actuality. Hamann and Kierkegaard both use Socrates in order to open religious dimensions in the currents of modern philosophy. Hamann and Kierkegaard share common foundations (Lutheranism), common objectives (elevating experience over knowledge), and common vehicles in their argumentation (Socrates and Socratic ignorance). === A Thesis submitted to the Department of Religion in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. === Summer Semester, 2004. === April 7, 2004. === Kierkegaard, Hamann, Socrates, Concept of Irony, Religion, Subjectivity === Includes bibliographical references. === David Kangas, Professor Directing Thesis; Martin Kavka, Committee Member; Sumner Twiss, Committee Member. |
author2 |
Feddon, Dustin Ryan (authoraut) |
author_facet |
Feddon, Dustin Ryan (authoraut) |
title |
The Other Heifer |
title_short |
The Other Heifer |
title_full |
The Other Heifer |
title_fullStr |
The Other Heifer |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Other Heifer |
title_sort |
other heifer |
publisher |
Florida State University |
url |
http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-4485 |
_version_ |
1719319383049764864 |