The Effects of Computer Support, Social Facilitation, and Arousal of Suspicion on Group Deceptive Communication

Today's business organizations emphasize the importance of teamwork and collaboration within work groups more than ever before. Unfortunately, group interaction is not always positive. Very little research has been conducted to investigate the behavior and judgments of group members who are bel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Marett, Kent (authoraut)
Format: Others
Language:English
English
Published: Florida State University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2742
id ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_180998
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_1809982020-06-09T03:10:13Z The Effects of Computer Support, Social Facilitation, and Arousal of Suspicion on Group Deceptive Communication Marett, Kent (authoraut) George, Joey F. (professor directing dissertation) Ferris, Gerald R. (outside committee member) Chudoba, Katherine M. (committee member) Paradice, David B. (committee member) Department of Management Information Systems (degree granting department) Florida State University (degree granting institution) Text text Florida State University Florida State University English eng 1 online resource computer application/pdf Today's business organizations emphasize the importance of teamwork and collaboration within work groups more than ever before. Unfortunately, group interaction is not always positive. Very little research has been conducted to investigate the behavior and judgments of group members who are belong to group in which one of the members is deceptive. This study is one of the first attempts to look at this phenomenon, from both the deceiver and receiver sides. Groups of three student subjects engaged in a group negotiation task, with one of the group members randomly assigned the role of deceiver. Groups varied by the availability of computer-supported communication for discussion purposes, their physical proximity with one another, and the number of group members who were warned about the possibility of deception. Hypotheses were developed to predict the amount of deceptive activity and the level of deception detection displayed by group members in each of these circumstances. Results indicated that individuals lied more when using computers to communicate with others and when both of their group partners had been warned. Group members were not proficient at detecting lies in any of the conditions. Implications of these findings and their potential implications for research and practice are discussed. A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Management Information Systems in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Summer Semester, 2004. June 17, 2004. Groups, Computers, CMC, Dispersion, Deception Includes bibliographical references. Joey F. George, Professor Directing Dissertation; Gerald R. Ferris, Outside Committee Member; Katherine M. Chudoba, Committee Member; David B. Paradice, Committee Member. Management information systems FSU_migr_etd-2742 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2742 This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A180998/datastream/TN/view/Effects%20of%20Computer%20Support%2C%20Social%20Facilitation%2C%20and%20Arousal%20of%20Suspicion%20on%20Group%20Deceptive%20Communication.jpg
collection NDLTD
language English
English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Management information systems
spellingShingle Management information systems
The Effects of Computer Support, Social Facilitation, and Arousal of Suspicion on Group Deceptive Communication
description Today's business organizations emphasize the importance of teamwork and collaboration within work groups more than ever before. Unfortunately, group interaction is not always positive. Very little research has been conducted to investigate the behavior and judgments of group members who are belong to group in which one of the members is deceptive. This study is one of the first attempts to look at this phenomenon, from both the deceiver and receiver sides. Groups of three student subjects engaged in a group negotiation task, with one of the group members randomly assigned the role of deceiver. Groups varied by the availability of computer-supported communication for discussion purposes, their physical proximity with one another, and the number of group members who were warned about the possibility of deception. Hypotheses were developed to predict the amount of deceptive activity and the level of deception detection displayed by group members in each of these circumstances. Results indicated that individuals lied more when using computers to communicate with others and when both of their group partners had been warned. Group members were not proficient at detecting lies in any of the conditions. Implications of these findings and their potential implications for research and practice are discussed. === A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Management Information Systems in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. === Summer Semester, 2004. === June 17, 2004. === Groups, Computers, CMC, Dispersion, Deception === Includes bibliographical references. === Joey F. George, Professor Directing Dissertation; Gerald R. Ferris, Outside Committee Member; Katherine M. Chudoba, Committee Member; David B. Paradice, Committee Member.
author2 Marett, Kent (authoraut)
author_facet Marett, Kent (authoraut)
title The Effects of Computer Support, Social Facilitation, and Arousal of Suspicion on Group Deceptive Communication
title_short The Effects of Computer Support, Social Facilitation, and Arousal of Suspicion on Group Deceptive Communication
title_full The Effects of Computer Support, Social Facilitation, and Arousal of Suspicion on Group Deceptive Communication
title_fullStr The Effects of Computer Support, Social Facilitation, and Arousal of Suspicion on Group Deceptive Communication
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Computer Support, Social Facilitation, and Arousal of Suspicion on Group Deceptive Communication
title_sort effects of computer support, social facilitation, and arousal of suspicion on group deceptive communication
publisher Florida State University
url http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2742
_version_ 1719318429769400320