War Before History: A Critical Survey
War features prominently in history, that is, in the records of literate societies. This paper addresses the issue of prehistoric warfare, that is, whether human societies without writing fight wars, and if so how often, under what circumstances, what tactics and technology they use, and how their w...
Other Authors: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Florida State University
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2153 |
id |
ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_180388 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_1803882020-06-09T03:09:12Z War Before History: A Critical Survey Myers, Darryl (authoraut) Davis, Frederick (professor directing thesis) Creswell, Michael (committee member) Grant, Jonathan (committee member) Department of History (degree granting department) Florida State University (degree granting institution) Text text Florida State University Florida State University English eng 1 online resource computer application/pdf War features prominently in history, that is, in the records of literate societies. This paper addresses the issue of prehistoric warfare, that is, whether human societies without writing fight wars, and if so how often, under what circumstances, what tactics and technology they use, and how their warfare differs from that of literate societies. As background, the paper reviews theoretical perspectives on prehistoric warfare and considers categories of data and problems with their interpretation in the absence of primary documents. In particular, researchers continue to invoke the perspectives of the philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau as touchstones of their thoughts on the topic of prehistoric warfare. The author has no particular training or expertise in anthropology or archeology, but from reviewing the literature suggests that available data supports neither the Hobbesian nor the Rousseauian extreme. Societies without writing sometimes fight and sometimes do not, just as societies with writing do. Hobbes' war of all against all is as mythical as Rousseau's peaceful savage. The paper ends with a call for continuing more nuanced interdisciplinary research into the issue of prehistoric warfare and its implications. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts. Fall Semester, 2005. August 5, 2005. Human Nature, Prehistory, Violence, Tactics, Interpretation Of Data Includes bibliographical references. Frederick Davis, Professor Directing Thesis; Michael Creswell, Committee Member; Jonathan Grant, Committee Member. History FSU_migr_etd-2153 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2153 This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A180388/datastream/TN/view/War%20Before%20History.jpg |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
History |
spellingShingle |
History War Before History: A Critical Survey |
description |
War features prominently in history, that is, in the records of literate societies. This paper addresses the issue of prehistoric warfare, that is, whether human societies without writing fight wars, and if so how often, under what circumstances, what tactics and technology they use, and how their warfare differs from that of literate societies. As background, the paper reviews theoretical perspectives on prehistoric warfare and considers categories of data and problems with their interpretation in the absence of primary documents. In particular, researchers continue to invoke the perspectives of the philosophers Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau as touchstones of their thoughts on the topic of prehistoric warfare. The author has no particular training or expertise in anthropology or archeology, but from reviewing the literature suggests that available data supports neither the Hobbesian nor the Rousseauian extreme. Societies without writing sometimes fight and sometimes do not, just as societies with writing do. Hobbes' war of all against all is as mythical as Rousseau's peaceful savage. The paper ends with a call for continuing more nuanced interdisciplinary research into the issue of prehistoric warfare and its implications. === A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts. === Fall Semester, 2005. === August 5, 2005. === Human Nature, Prehistory, Violence, Tactics, Interpretation Of Data === Includes bibliographical references. === Frederick Davis, Professor Directing Thesis; Michael Creswell, Committee Member; Jonathan Grant, Committee Member. |
author2 |
Myers, Darryl (authoraut) |
author_facet |
Myers, Darryl (authoraut) |
title |
War Before History: A Critical Survey |
title_short |
War Before History: A Critical Survey |
title_full |
War Before History: A Critical Survey |
title_fullStr |
War Before History: A Critical Survey |
title_full_unstemmed |
War Before History: A Critical Survey |
title_sort |
war before history: a critical survey |
publisher |
Florida State University |
url |
http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2153 |
_version_ |
1719318301066133504 |