An Archaeobotanical Analysis

Fort Mitchell (1Ru102), a frontier fort in East Alabama, was built during the First Creek Indian War in 1813 and occupied until 1840, four years after Indian Removal. In spite of its historical importance, information concerning daily life and, more specifically, foodways of soldiers and Lower Creek...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Stickler, Justin C. (authoraut)
Format: Others
Language:English
English
Published: Florida State University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-0382
id ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_168509
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_1685092019-07-01T03:57:33Z An Archaeobotanical Analysis Stickler, Justin C. (authoraut) Ward, Cheryl (professor directing thesis) Marrinan, Rochelle (committee member) Miller, Thomas (committee member) Department of Anthropology (degree granting department) Florida State University (degree granting institution) Text text Florida State University English eng 1 online resource computer application/pdf Fort Mitchell (1Ru102), a frontier fort in East Alabama, was built during the First Creek Indian War in 1813 and occupied until 1840, four years after Indian Removal. In spite of its historical importance, information concerning daily life and, more specifically, foodways of soldiers and Lower Creeks is scarce. Archaeological material recovered from 1Ru102 has recently been analyzed. Archaeobotanical data obtained from 15 features are presented, and inferences are made about potential utilization of wild and domesticated plants by Georgia Militia (1st Fort), United States soldiers (2nd Fort), and Creek Indians (both forts) at Fort Mitchell. Two specific questions about the dietary use of plants recovered at 1Ru102 are explored. First, to what extent, if any, did soldiers supplement their rations with local foods? Second, what plants potentially contributed to soldier and Creek Indian diet at Fort Mitchell? Eleven economic plant species were identified, and it is suggested that these plants likely contributed to soldier and Creek diet. This analysis indicates that the most important food plant groups were domesticates (maize, peach), mast (walnut, hickory, and oak.), and fleshy fruits (plums/cherries, hackberry, grape, maypop.). Minimal botanical information is available for multicomponent historic sites—especially forts—in Alabama, and this archaeobotanical analysis contributes information to this neglected area of interest. A Thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2004. Date of Defense: February 19, 2004. Plant use, Diet, Seed identification, Botanical analysis, Fort Mitchell, Creeks, Georgia Militia Includes bibliographical references. Cheryl Ward, Professor Directing Thesis; Rochelle Marrinan, Committee Member; Thomas Miller, Committee Member. Anthropology FSU_migr_etd-0382 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-0382 http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A168509/datastream/TN/view/Archaeobotanical%20Analysis.jpg
collection NDLTD
language English
English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Anthropology
spellingShingle Anthropology
An Archaeobotanical Analysis
description Fort Mitchell (1Ru102), a frontier fort in East Alabama, was built during the First Creek Indian War in 1813 and occupied until 1840, four years after Indian Removal. In spite of its historical importance, information concerning daily life and, more specifically, foodways of soldiers and Lower Creeks is scarce. Archaeological material recovered from 1Ru102 has recently been analyzed. Archaeobotanical data obtained from 15 features are presented, and inferences are made about potential utilization of wild and domesticated plants by Georgia Militia (1st Fort), United States soldiers (2nd Fort), and Creek Indians (both forts) at Fort Mitchell. Two specific questions about the dietary use of plants recovered at 1Ru102 are explored. First, to what extent, if any, did soldiers supplement their rations with local foods? Second, what plants potentially contributed to soldier and Creek Indian diet at Fort Mitchell? Eleven economic plant species were identified, and it is suggested that these plants likely contributed to soldier and Creek diet. This analysis indicates that the most important food plant groups were domesticates (maize, peach), mast (walnut, hickory, and oak.), and fleshy fruits (plums/cherries, hackberry, grape, maypop.). Minimal botanical information is available for multicomponent historic sites—especially forts—in Alabama, and this archaeobotanical analysis contributes information to this neglected area of interest. === A Thesis submitted to the Department of Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. === Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2004. === Date of Defense: February 19, 2004. === Plant use, Diet, Seed identification, Botanical analysis, Fort Mitchell, Creeks, Georgia Militia === Includes bibliographical references. === Cheryl Ward, Professor Directing Thesis; Rochelle Marrinan, Committee Member; Thomas Miller, Committee Member.
author2 Stickler, Justin C. (authoraut)
author_facet Stickler, Justin C. (authoraut)
title An Archaeobotanical Analysis
title_short An Archaeobotanical Analysis
title_full An Archaeobotanical Analysis
title_fullStr An Archaeobotanical Analysis
title_full_unstemmed An Archaeobotanical Analysis
title_sort archaeobotanical analysis
publisher Florida State University
url http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-0382
_version_ 1719214959918841856