Brainstorming and Auditors' Fraud Risk Assessments in the Presence of Pressures and Opportunties
According to SAS No. 99 and the "Fraud Triangle" there are three major classes of fraud risk factors: pressures, opportunities, and rationalizations. This study first investigates the manner in which auditors react to pressures and opportunities, while assessing fraud risk and, searching f...
Other Authors: | Desai, Naman (authoraut) |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Florida State University
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-0072 |
Similar Items
- An Examination of the Relationship between Individual Fraud Impressions Formed during Fraud Brainstorming and Subsequent Auditor Judgments and Decisions
- Partner Influence, Team Brainstorming, and Fraud Risk Assessment: Some Implications of SAS No. 99
-
The Effect of the Implicit Theory of Integrity on an Internal Auditor's Assessment of Management Fraud Risk
by: Watson, Stephanie F.
Published: (2004) -
Assessment of fraud risk performance: interaction effects of brainstorming and task structure of government auditors / Mohd Daniel Mohd Nassir ... [et al.]
by: Mohd Nassir, Mohd Daniel, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Can strategic reasoning prompts improve auditors' sensitivity to fraud risk?
by: Bowlin, Kendall Owen
Published: (2012)