Exoneration or Observation? Examining a Novel Difference Between Liars and Truth Tellers
Individual cues to deception are subtle and often missed by lay people and law enforcement alike. Linguistic statement analysis remains a potentially useful way of overcoming individual diagnostic limitations (e.g. Criteria based Content Analysis; Steller & Köhnken, 1989; Reality monitoring; Joh...
Main Author: | Molinaro, Peter F |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
FIU Digital Commons
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1833 http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2990&context=etd |
Similar Items
-
Deceptively simple… The deception-general ability and the need to put the liar under the spotlight.
by: Gordon R.T. Wright, et al.
Published: (2013-08-01) -
Microexpressions Are Not the Best Way to Catch a Liar
by: Judee K. Burgoon
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: A review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches
by: Jeffrey John Walczyk, et al.
Published: (2013-02-01) -
Digging Further Into the Speech of Liars: Future Research Prospects in Verbal Lie Detection
by: Galit Nahari, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Differences in Language Used by Deceivers and Truth-Tellers in Thai Online Chat
by: Montarat Rungruangthum, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)