Logic in Accounts of the Potential and Actual Infinite

This work provides a detailed account of the historical role of the distinction between the potential and actual infinite in a variety of debates within natural philosophy and mathematics. It then connects these historical positions to modern debates over the possibility of pluralism within philosop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Finley, James Robert
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-ckqb-4k11
id ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-d8-ckqb-4k11
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-d8-ckqb-4k112019-10-29T03:28:52ZLogic in Accounts of the Potential and Actual InfiniteFinley, James Robert2019ThesesPhilosophyInfiniteLogicPluralismPhilosophy and religion--History of doctrinesMathematics--PhilosophyThis work provides a detailed account of the historical role of the distinction between the potential and actual infinite in a variety of debates within natural philosophy and mathematics. It then connects these historical positions to modern debates over the possibility of pluralism within philosophy of logic and mathematics. In particular, it defends a view under which theories of the infinite and logic are justified abductively, and it argues that this abductive methodology provides space for an interesting pluralism about both the infinite and logical consequence. This argument relies on a detailed and thorough historical investigation into ancient, medieval, early modern, and modern views of the infinite, revealing a range of background metaphysical and epistemological commitments that motivate different abductive criteria for sophisticated philosophical positions on the infinite. It then suggests that charitable interpretations of the historical positions on the infinite should lead one to endorse a logical pluralism.Englishhttps://doi.org/10.7916/d8-ckqb-4k11
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Philosophy
Infinite
Logic
Pluralism
Philosophy and religion--History of doctrines
Mathematics--Philosophy
spellingShingle Philosophy
Infinite
Logic
Pluralism
Philosophy and religion--History of doctrines
Mathematics--Philosophy
Finley, James Robert
Logic in Accounts of the Potential and Actual Infinite
description This work provides a detailed account of the historical role of the distinction between the potential and actual infinite in a variety of debates within natural philosophy and mathematics. It then connects these historical positions to modern debates over the possibility of pluralism within philosophy of logic and mathematics. In particular, it defends a view under which theories of the infinite and logic are justified abductively, and it argues that this abductive methodology provides space for an interesting pluralism about both the infinite and logical consequence. This argument relies on a detailed and thorough historical investigation into ancient, medieval, early modern, and modern views of the infinite, revealing a range of background metaphysical and epistemological commitments that motivate different abductive criteria for sophisticated philosophical positions on the infinite. It then suggests that charitable interpretations of the historical positions on the infinite should lead one to endorse a logical pluralism.
author Finley, James Robert
author_facet Finley, James Robert
author_sort Finley, James Robert
title Logic in Accounts of the Potential and Actual Infinite
title_short Logic in Accounts of the Potential and Actual Infinite
title_full Logic in Accounts of the Potential and Actual Infinite
title_fullStr Logic in Accounts of the Potential and Actual Infinite
title_full_unstemmed Logic in Accounts of the Potential and Actual Infinite
title_sort logic in accounts of the potential and actual infinite
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-ckqb-4k11
work_keys_str_mv AT finleyjamesrobert logicinaccountsofthepotentialandactualinfinite
_version_ 1719280214489432064