Patterns of Perception

Our ordinary concept of perception contains a seeming tension: we distinguish perception from thought on the grounds that it is a direct awareness of mind-independent objects through their effects on our senses; yet we also allow that what we see (hear, feel, etc) is determined by how we interpret o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gasiunas-Kopp, Nemira Hathor
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-6xhm-1492
id ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-d8-6xhm-1492
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-d8-6xhm-14922019-06-04T03:05:36ZPatterns of PerceptionGasiunas-Kopp, Nemira Hathor2019ThesesPhilosophyPerceptionClassificationOur ordinary concept of perception contains a seeming tension: we distinguish perception from thought on the grounds that it is a direct awareness of mind-independent objects through their effects on our senses; yet we also allow that what we see (hear, feel, etc) is determined by how we interpret or classify the data that comes through our senses. Theorists of perception disagree over which of these intuitions should prevail, with some maintaining that concepts are in play all the way down and others that perceptual awareness is wholly immediate and concrete. But we do not have to choose. This dissertation argues that the patterns of perception sustain a distinctive form of nonconceptual classification, in which property spaces organize sensory matter so as to preserve rather than discard its concreteness and detail. What then is classification without concepts? What sort of abstraction, generality, representation, or form does it entail? And what ramifications then for thinking about the roots of language and reason, and of our awareness of the external world?Englishhttps://doi.org/10.7916/d8-6xhm-1492
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Philosophy
Perception
Classification
spellingShingle Philosophy
Perception
Classification
Gasiunas-Kopp, Nemira Hathor
Patterns of Perception
description Our ordinary concept of perception contains a seeming tension: we distinguish perception from thought on the grounds that it is a direct awareness of mind-independent objects through their effects on our senses; yet we also allow that what we see (hear, feel, etc) is determined by how we interpret or classify the data that comes through our senses. Theorists of perception disagree over which of these intuitions should prevail, with some maintaining that concepts are in play all the way down and others that perceptual awareness is wholly immediate and concrete. But we do not have to choose. This dissertation argues that the patterns of perception sustain a distinctive form of nonconceptual classification, in which property spaces organize sensory matter so as to preserve rather than discard its concreteness and detail. What then is classification without concepts? What sort of abstraction, generality, representation, or form does it entail? And what ramifications then for thinking about the roots of language and reason, and of our awareness of the external world?
author Gasiunas-Kopp, Nemira Hathor
author_facet Gasiunas-Kopp, Nemira Hathor
author_sort Gasiunas-Kopp, Nemira Hathor
title Patterns of Perception
title_short Patterns of Perception
title_full Patterns of Perception
title_fullStr Patterns of Perception
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of Perception
title_sort patterns of perception
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-6xhm-1492
work_keys_str_mv AT gasiunaskoppnemirahathor patternsofperception
_version_ 1719199076990320640