Psychological Outcomes of Prototypicality in Marginalized Group Members

Social psychologists have long been interested in judgments of stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination towards people with marginalized identities. However, the majority of past social psychological studies have focused on understanding how perceivers view one dimension of marginalized identity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohr, Rebecca
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7916/D8WD5HF5
id ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-D8WD5HF5
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-D8WD5HF52019-05-09T15:16:00ZPsychological Outcomes of Prototypicality in Marginalized Group MembersMohr, Rebecca2018ThesesSocial psychologyStereotypes (Social psychology)Minorities--PsychologySocial psychologists have long been interested in judgments of stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination towards people with marginalized identities. However, the majority of past social psychological studies have focused on understanding how perceivers view one dimension of marginalized identity in isolation from other marginalized identities. Specifically, past studies typically focus on the group members who are believed to be the most prototypical of marginalized groups in order to examine processes associated with discrimination (e.g., using Black men as targets when studying prejudice towards Black people). Because previous work largely examines the perceptions and experiences of prototypical marginalized group members, our understanding of stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination is incomplete. I report five studies that use the intersectional invisibility framework as a scaffold to explore how perceivers’ judgments of prototypical versus non-prototypical group members differ. In Study 1, I explore how non-prototypical marginalized group members are represented in the media relative to their prototypical counterparts. Study 2 measures how explicit perceived stereotypes of prototypical and non-prototypical marginalized group members differ. Study 3 investigates how perceivers make attributions about prototypical and non-prototypical marginalized groups. Studies 4 and 5 examine how perceivers detect discrimination towards prototypical and non-prototypical marginalized group members. These studies empirically demonstrate that non-prototypical marginalized group members are perceived differently than their prototypical counterparts. These differences are associated with downstream consequences including reduced representation in popular culture and enhanced perceiver attention towards non-prototypical group members when compared to their prototypical counterparts.Englishhttps://doi.org/10.7916/D8WD5HF5
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Social psychology
Stereotypes (Social psychology)
Minorities--Psychology
spellingShingle Social psychology
Stereotypes (Social psychology)
Minorities--Psychology
Mohr, Rebecca
Psychological Outcomes of Prototypicality in Marginalized Group Members
description Social psychologists have long been interested in judgments of stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination towards people with marginalized identities. However, the majority of past social psychological studies have focused on understanding how perceivers view one dimension of marginalized identity in isolation from other marginalized identities. Specifically, past studies typically focus on the group members who are believed to be the most prototypical of marginalized groups in order to examine processes associated with discrimination (e.g., using Black men as targets when studying prejudice towards Black people). Because previous work largely examines the perceptions and experiences of prototypical marginalized group members, our understanding of stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination is incomplete. I report five studies that use the intersectional invisibility framework as a scaffold to explore how perceivers’ judgments of prototypical versus non-prototypical group members differ. In Study 1, I explore how non-prototypical marginalized group members are represented in the media relative to their prototypical counterparts. Study 2 measures how explicit perceived stereotypes of prototypical and non-prototypical marginalized group members differ. Study 3 investigates how perceivers make attributions about prototypical and non-prototypical marginalized groups. Studies 4 and 5 examine how perceivers detect discrimination towards prototypical and non-prototypical marginalized group members. These studies empirically demonstrate that non-prototypical marginalized group members are perceived differently than their prototypical counterparts. These differences are associated with downstream consequences including reduced representation in popular culture and enhanced perceiver attention towards non-prototypical group members when compared to their prototypical counterparts.
author Mohr, Rebecca
author_facet Mohr, Rebecca
author_sort Mohr, Rebecca
title Psychological Outcomes of Prototypicality in Marginalized Group Members
title_short Psychological Outcomes of Prototypicality in Marginalized Group Members
title_full Psychological Outcomes of Prototypicality in Marginalized Group Members
title_fullStr Psychological Outcomes of Prototypicality in Marginalized Group Members
title_full_unstemmed Psychological Outcomes of Prototypicality in Marginalized Group Members
title_sort psychological outcomes of prototypicality in marginalized group members
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.7916/D8WD5HF5
work_keys_str_mv AT mohrrebecca psychologicaloutcomesofprototypicalityinmarginalizedgroupmembers
_version_ 1719047212785205248