Authenticity and Death in Being and Time
My dissertation offers a critique of the concept of authenticity that Martin Heidegger develops in Being and Time. The concept of authenticity has been critiqued for many reasons--mainly for political, moral, and ideological reasons. My dissertation develops, on the other hand, a conceptual critique...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.7916/D8QZ2J2G |
id |
ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-D8QZ2J2G |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-D8QZ2J2G2019-05-09T15:13:51ZAuthenticity and Death in Being and TimeShaw, Beau Carmel2012ThesesPhilosophyMy dissertation offers a critique of the concept of authenticity that Martin Heidegger develops in Being and Time. The concept of authenticity has been critiqued for many reasons--mainly for political, moral, and ideological reasons. My dissertation develops, on the other hand, a conceptual critique: I argue that the concept of authenticity is a paradoxical concept. I argue, more precisely, that it is paradoxical, as the concept of authenticity proposes, for a person to confront, transparently and determinedly, his or her own death, while, at the same time, being able to be an individual--understanding him or herself as an individual, and making autonomous choices. In offering this critique, I provide interpretations of some of the basic concepts in Being and Time that break from conventional interpretations or are new. For example, I interpret the concept of inauthenticity from the perspective of the psychoanalytic idea of mania. Ultimately, however, I provide philosophical, or conceptual reasons to resist a concept with clearly problematic moral and political implications.Englishhttps://doi.org/10.7916/D8QZ2J2G |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Philosophy |
spellingShingle |
Philosophy Shaw, Beau Carmel Authenticity and Death in Being and Time |
description |
My dissertation offers a critique of the concept of authenticity that Martin Heidegger develops in Being and Time. The concept of authenticity has been critiqued for many reasons--mainly for political, moral, and ideological reasons. My dissertation develops, on the other hand, a conceptual critique: I argue that the concept of authenticity is a paradoxical concept. I argue, more precisely, that it is paradoxical, as the concept of authenticity proposes, for a person to confront, transparently and determinedly, his or her own death, while, at the same time, being able to be an individual--understanding him or herself as an individual, and making autonomous choices. In offering this critique, I provide interpretations of some of the basic concepts in Being and Time that break from conventional interpretations or are new. For example, I interpret the concept of inauthenticity from the perspective of the psychoanalytic idea of mania. Ultimately, however, I provide philosophical, or conceptual reasons to resist a concept with clearly problematic moral and political implications. |
author |
Shaw, Beau Carmel |
author_facet |
Shaw, Beau Carmel |
author_sort |
Shaw, Beau Carmel |
title |
Authenticity and Death in Being and Time |
title_short |
Authenticity and Death in Being and Time |
title_full |
Authenticity and Death in Being and Time |
title_fullStr |
Authenticity and Death in Being and Time |
title_full_unstemmed |
Authenticity and Death in Being and Time |
title_sort |
authenticity and death in being and time |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.7916/D8QZ2J2G |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shawbeaucarmel authenticityanddeathinbeingandtime |
_version_ |
1719045579594530816 |