The Unipolar Era: Why American Power Persists and China's Rise Is Limited

Is unipolarity sustainable? The dominant perspective among international relations scholars is that the United States is in decline relative to China, and that much of this decline is the result of globalization and the hegemonic burdens the United States bears to sustain globalization. According to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beckley, Michael Charles
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7916/D80P1617
id ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-D80P1617
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-D80P16172019-05-09T15:13:45ZThe Unipolar Era: Why American Power Persists and China's Rise Is LimitedBeckley, Michael Charles2012ThesesPolitical scienceUnipolarity (International relations)International relationsIs unipolarity sustainable? The dominant perspective among international relations scholars is that the United States is in decline relative to China, and that much of this decline is the result of globalization and the hegemonic burdens the United States bears to sustain globalization. According to an alternative perspective, however, globalization and hegemony reinforce unipolarity. This study tests these perspectives against each other and finds significant support for the alternative perspective. The results suggest that unipolarity is not a temporary aberration, but rather a deeply embedded condition with the potential to persist well into this century.Englishhttps://doi.org/10.7916/D80P1617
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Political science
Unipolarity (International relations)
International relations
spellingShingle Political science
Unipolarity (International relations)
International relations
Beckley, Michael Charles
The Unipolar Era: Why American Power Persists and China's Rise Is Limited
description Is unipolarity sustainable? The dominant perspective among international relations scholars is that the United States is in decline relative to China, and that much of this decline is the result of globalization and the hegemonic burdens the United States bears to sustain globalization. According to an alternative perspective, however, globalization and hegemony reinforce unipolarity. This study tests these perspectives against each other and finds significant support for the alternative perspective. The results suggest that unipolarity is not a temporary aberration, but rather a deeply embedded condition with the potential to persist well into this century.
author Beckley, Michael Charles
author_facet Beckley, Michael Charles
author_sort Beckley, Michael Charles
title The Unipolar Era: Why American Power Persists and China's Rise Is Limited
title_short The Unipolar Era: Why American Power Persists and China's Rise Is Limited
title_full The Unipolar Era: Why American Power Persists and China's Rise Is Limited
title_fullStr The Unipolar Era: Why American Power Persists and China's Rise Is Limited
title_full_unstemmed The Unipolar Era: Why American Power Persists and China's Rise Is Limited
title_sort unipolar era: why american power persists and china's rise is limited
publishDate 2012
url https://doi.org/10.7916/D80P1617
work_keys_str_mv AT beckleymichaelcharles theunipolarerawhyamericanpowerpersistsandchinasriseislimited
AT beckleymichaelcharles unipolarerawhyamericanpowerpersistsandchinasriseislimited
_version_ 1719045228142264320