Trolling: The Effects of Social Influence on Online Discrimination

With the increased use of online communication in our everyday lives, there is a growing need to understand social influence in such settings. The current research posits that online social norms can influence readers‟ anti-social and pro-social behaviours online, specifically individual expressions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hsueh, Mark
Language:en
Published: University of Canterbury. Psychology 2014
Subjects:
IAT
CMC
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/9463
id ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-9463
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-94632015-08-06T03:34:39ZTrolling: The Effects of Social Influence on Online DiscriminationHsueh, MarkPrejudiceIATexplicitimplicitonlinecomputer mediated-communicationCMCanti-socialcommentscommenterssocial behavioursocial psychologyonline communicationbiassocial influencesocial normsinternal motivationsexternal motivationsWith the increased use of online communication in our everyday lives, there is a growing need to understand social influence in such settings. The current research posits that online social norms can influence readers‟ anti-social and pro-social behaviours online, specifically individual expressions of prejudice. Participants read an online article proposing an increase to international student scholarship funding, then were randomly placed in one of two normative conditions where they read Anti-Prejudiced or Pro-Prejudiced comments allegedly placed by other users. Participants then left their own comments before completing a self-report prejudice questionnaire and an implicit association test (IAT). Social norms created by the fictitious comments influenced respondents to comment with more or less bigoted sentiments aligned with the fictitious social norm. Participants reading prejudiced online comments showed increased implicit and explicit prejudice, while those reading anti-prejudiced online comments showed the reverse. Participants‟ internal and external motivations to control prejudice were also measured and hypothesised to moderate the effects of social norms on bias expressions. However, this hypothesis was unsupported with participants‟ internal and external motivations to control prejudice inconsistently moderating the effects of the social norm on their prejudice expressions. These findings suggest possible avenues for social change in online environments, and criteria to help establish more positive online social norms.University of Canterbury. Psychology2014-08-04T21:43:10Z2015-08-05T12:20:05Z2014Electronic thesis or dissertationTexthttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/9463enNZCUCopyright Mark Hsuehhttp://library.canterbury.ac.nz/thesis/etheses_copyright.shtml
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Prejudice
IAT
explicit
implicit
online
computer mediated-communication
CMC
anti-social
comments
commenters
social behaviour
social psychology
online communication
bias
social influence
social norms
internal motivations
external motivations
spellingShingle Prejudice
IAT
explicit
implicit
online
computer mediated-communication
CMC
anti-social
comments
commenters
social behaviour
social psychology
online communication
bias
social influence
social norms
internal motivations
external motivations
Hsueh, Mark
Trolling: The Effects of Social Influence on Online Discrimination
description With the increased use of online communication in our everyday lives, there is a growing need to understand social influence in such settings. The current research posits that online social norms can influence readers‟ anti-social and pro-social behaviours online, specifically individual expressions of prejudice. Participants read an online article proposing an increase to international student scholarship funding, then were randomly placed in one of two normative conditions where they read Anti-Prejudiced or Pro-Prejudiced comments allegedly placed by other users. Participants then left their own comments before completing a self-report prejudice questionnaire and an implicit association test (IAT). Social norms created by the fictitious comments influenced respondents to comment with more or less bigoted sentiments aligned with the fictitious social norm. Participants reading prejudiced online comments showed increased implicit and explicit prejudice, while those reading anti-prejudiced online comments showed the reverse. Participants‟ internal and external motivations to control prejudice were also measured and hypothesised to moderate the effects of social norms on bias expressions. However, this hypothesis was unsupported with participants‟ internal and external motivations to control prejudice inconsistently moderating the effects of the social norm on their prejudice expressions. These findings suggest possible avenues for social change in online environments, and criteria to help establish more positive online social norms.
author Hsueh, Mark
author_facet Hsueh, Mark
author_sort Hsueh, Mark
title Trolling: The Effects of Social Influence on Online Discrimination
title_short Trolling: The Effects of Social Influence on Online Discrimination
title_full Trolling: The Effects of Social Influence on Online Discrimination
title_fullStr Trolling: The Effects of Social Influence on Online Discrimination
title_full_unstemmed Trolling: The Effects of Social Influence on Online Discrimination
title_sort trolling: the effects of social influence on online discrimination
publisher University of Canterbury. Psychology
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/9463
work_keys_str_mv AT hsuehmark trollingtheeffectsofsocialinfluenceononlinediscrimination
_version_ 1716815953581309952