Andrew Miller and his Eagles - American Citizens, British Subjects and Rights in the ImpressmentControversy
In 1812 impressment was left as the implied cause for the outbreak of war between Britain and the United States of America. Scholars have focused on how impressment was involved in diplomacy. There remains, however, a lack of investigation into the justification of impressment. This dissertation exp...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Language: | en |
| Published: |
University of Canterbury. History
2013
|
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/8625 |
| Summary: | In 1812 impressment was left as the implied cause for the outbreak of war between Britain
and the United States of America. Scholars have focused on how impressment was involved
in diplomacy. There remains, however, a lack of investigation into the justification of
impressment. This dissertation explores the impressment of Americans by the Royal Navy
and the resulting fallout. The research will focus on one group in particular: naturalised
American citizens. The aim is to show that the conflict over impressment stemmed from
Britain and America possessing different conceptualisations of citizenship and rights. The
dissertation examines the history of impressment in Britain and the doctrine of indefeasible
allegiance together with American arguments against the doctrine. This research is based on
the correspondence of politicians, treatises, laws and secondary scholarship. Using these
sources a narrative of diplomacy and rights will be constructed. Upon the examination of the
evidence it becomes clear that American claims about the unjustness of the impressment of
naturalised American citizens are wrong. While there was a dispute if naturalisation could
occur, the fact is that the American government loudly disputed the British right to reclaim a
large number of naturalised sailors when by the laws of America these sailors were not
naturalised. |
|---|