Calibration of trip distribution by generalised linear models

Generalised linear models (GLMs) provide a flexible and sound basis for calibrating gravity models for trip distribution, for a wide range of deterrence functions (from steps to splines), with K factors and geographic segmentation. The Tanner function fitted Wellington Transport Strategy Model data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shrewsbury, John Stephen
Language:en
Published: University of Canterbury. Department of Civil and Natuaral Resources Engineering 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/7685
id ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-7685
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-76852015-03-30T15:29:34ZCalibration of trip distribution by generalised linear modelsShrewsbury, John StephenCalibrationdeterrence functiondeviancegeospatialgravityhierarchical generalised linear modelmatrix estimationmixed logitMVESTMregressionsparsitytransport modeltrip distributionGeneralised linear models (GLMs) provide a flexible and sound basis for calibrating gravity models for trip distribution, for a wide range of deterrence functions (from steps to splines), with K factors and geographic segmentation. The Tanner function fitted Wellington Transport Strategy Model data as well as more complex functions and was insensitive to the formulation of intrazonal and external costs. Weighting from variable expansion factors and interpretation of the deviance under sparsity are addressed. An observed trip matrix is disaggregated and fitted at the household, person and trip levels with consistent results. Hierarchical GLMs (HGLMs) are formulated to fit mixed logit models, but were unable to reproduce the coefficients of simple nested logit models. Geospatial analysis by HGLM showed no evidence of spatial error patterns, either as random K factors or as correlations between them. Equivalence with hierarchical mode choice, duality with trip distribution, regularisation, lorelograms, and the modifiable areal unit problem are considered. Trip distribution is calibrated from aggregate data by the MVESTM matrix estimation package, incorporating period and direction factors in the intercepts. Counts across four screenlines showed a significance similar to a thousand-household travel survey. Calibration was possible only in conjuction with trip end data. Criteria for validation against screenline counts were met, but only if allowance was made for error in the trip end data.University of Canterbury. Department of Civil and Natuaral Resources Engineering2013-05-09T03:18:57Z2013-05-09T03:18:57Z2012Electronic thesis or dissertationTexthttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/7685enNZCUCopyright John Stephen Shrewsburyhttp://library.canterbury.ac.nz/thesis/etheses_copyright.shtml
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic Calibration
deterrence function
deviance
geospatial
gravity
hierarchical generalised linear model
matrix estimation
mixed logit
MVESTM
regression
sparsity
transport model
trip distribution
spellingShingle Calibration
deterrence function
deviance
geospatial
gravity
hierarchical generalised linear model
matrix estimation
mixed logit
MVESTM
regression
sparsity
transport model
trip distribution
Shrewsbury, John Stephen
Calibration of trip distribution by generalised linear models
description Generalised linear models (GLMs) provide a flexible and sound basis for calibrating gravity models for trip distribution, for a wide range of deterrence functions (from steps to splines), with K factors and geographic segmentation. The Tanner function fitted Wellington Transport Strategy Model data as well as more complex functions and was insensitive to the formulation of intrazonal and external costs. Weighting from variable expansion factors and interpretation of the deviance under sparsity are addressed. An observed trip matrix is disaggregated and fitted at the household, person and trip levels with consistent results. Hierarchical GLMs (HGLMs) are formulated to fit mixed logit models, but were unable to reproduce the coefficients of simple nested logit models. Geospatial analysis by HGLM showed no evidence of spatial error patterns, either as random K factors or as correlations between them. Equivalence with hierarchical mode choice, duality with trip distribution, regularisation, lorelograms, and the modifiable areal unit problem are considered. Trip distribution is calibrated from aggregate data by the MVESTM matrix estimation package, incorporating period and direction factors in the intercepts. Counts across four screenlines showed a significance similar to a thousand-household travel survey. Calibration was possible only in conjuction with trip end data. Criteria for validation against screenline counts were met, but only if allowance was made for error in the trip end data.
author Shrewsbury, John Stephen
author_facet Shrewsbury, John Stephen
author_sort Shrewsbury, John Stephen
title Calibration of trip distribution by generalised linear models
title_short Calibration of trip distribution by generalised linear models
title_full Calibration of trip distribution by generalised linear models
title_fullStr Calibration of trip distribution by generalised linear models
title_full_unstemmed Calibration of trip distribution by generalised linear models
title_sort calibration of trip distribution by generalised linear models
publisher University of Canterbury. Department of Civil and Natuaral Resources Engineering
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/7685
work_keys_str_mv AT shrewsburyjohnstephen calibrationoftripdistributionbygeneralisedlinearmodels
_version_ 1716798951992066048