In the restoration plantings at Riccarton Bush, are some planted species, or species combinations, better nurses for regeneration than other species and what are the features that characterise these species?

The aim of this dissertation was to find out if certain plant combinations in the canopy of restoration plantings in Riccarton Bush were more effective nurse plants than other plant combinations and what were the characteristics that these plants had. Fifty plots in Riccarton Bush were analysed and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Currie, Lynlee Ruth
Language:en
Published: University of Canterbury. Forestry 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/7160
id ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-7160
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-71602015-03-30T15:29:30ZIn the restoration plantings at Riccarton Bush, are some planted species, or species combinations, better nurses for regeneration than other species and what are the features that characterise these species?Currie, Lynlee RuthThe aim of this dissertation was to find out if certain plant combinations in the canopy of restoration plantings in Riccarton Bush were more effective nurse plants than other plant combinations and what were the characteristics that these plants had. Fifty plots in Riccarton Bush were analysed and it was found that Community Two, a Pittosporum tenuifolium-Coprosma robusta forest had a significantly larger number of seedlings (greater than 10 centimetres in height) than three other Communities present in the restoration plantings. It was also found that the total canopy cover in the restoration plantings had little effect on the number of seedlings on the forest floor. It was decided that the primary reason for the greater nurse plant ability of Community Two was its attractiveness to birds as Pittosporum tenuifolium and Coprosma robusta have the most preferred fruit colour out of the four Communities. Other reasons include the moderate amounts of light getting through to the forest floor and the branchiness of trees favoured by birds.University of Canterbury. Forestry2012-10-26T02:40:49Z2012-10-26T02:40:49Z1997Electronic thesis or dissertationTexthttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/7160enNZCUCopyright Lynlee Ruth Curriehttp://library.canterbury.ac.nz/thesis/etheses_copyright.shtml
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
description The aim of this dissertation was to find out if certain plant combinations in the canopy of restoration plantings in Riccarton Bush were more effective nurse plants than other plant combinations and what were the characteristics that these plants had. Fifty plots in Riccarton Bush were analysed and it was found that Community Two, a Pittosporum tenuifolium-Coprosma robusta forest had a significantly larger number of seedlings (greater than 10 centimetres in height) than three other Communities present in the restoration plantings. It was also found that the total canopy cover in the restoration plantings had little effect on the number of seedlings on the forest floor. It was decided that the primary reason for the greater nurse plant ability of Community Two was its attractiveness to birds as Pittosporum tenuifolium and Coprosma robusta have the most preferred fruit colour out of the four Communities. Other reasons include the moderate amounts of light getting through to the forest floor and the branchiness of trees favoured by birds.
author Currie, Lynlee Ruth
spellingShingle Currie, Lynlee Ruth
In the restoration plantings at Riccarton Bush, are some planted species, or species combinations, better nurses for regeneration than other species and what are the features that characterise these species?
author_facet Currie, Lynlee Ruth
author_sort Currie, Lynlee Ruth
title In the restoration plantings at Riccarton Bush, are some planted species, or species combinations, better nurses for regeneration than other species and what are the features that characterise these species?
title_short In the restoration plantings at Riccarton Bush, are some planted species, or species combinations, better nurses for regeneration than other species and what are the features that characterise these species?
title_full In the restoration plantings at Riccarton Bush, are some planted species, or species combinations, better nurses for regeneration than other species and what are the features that characterise these species?
title_fullStr In the restoration plantings at Riccarton Bush, are some planted species, or species combinations, better nurses for regeneration than other species and what are the features that characterise these species?
title_full_unstemmed In the restoration plantings at Riccarton Bush, are some planted species, or species combinations, better nurses for regeneration than other species and what are the features that characterise these species?
title_sort in the restoration plantings at riccarton bush, are some planted species, or species combinations, better nurses for regeneration than other species and what are the features that characterise these species?
publisher University of Canterbury. Forestry
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/7160
work_keys_str_mv AT currielynleeruth intherestorationplantingsatriccartonbusharesomeplantedspeciesorspeciescombinationsbetternursesforregenerationthanotherspeciesandwhatarethefeaturesthatcharacterisethesespecies
_version_ 1716798905090310144