Reflexivity and psychology : an unresolved dilemma.

The seemingly endless possibility of reflecting upon psychological theories and 'knowledge' has created an intractable difficulty in understanding what psychology is about and what it produces. This 'problem of reflexivity' was therefore adopted as the focus of this dissertation....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moore, Kevin
Language:en
Published: University of Canterbury. Psychology 2011
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/5823
id ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-5823
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-58232015-03-30T15:30:43ZReflexivity and psychology : an unresolved dilemma.Moore, KevinThe seemingly endless possibility of reflecting upon psychological theories and 'knowledge' has created an intractable difficulty in understanding what psychology is about and what it produces. This 'problem of reflexivity' was therefore adopted as the focus of this dissertation. The aim was to determine whether it is possible for psychology to be understood clearly without ignoring or denying the 'problem of reflexivity'. Selected dichotomies and debates representative of various subject areas and theoretical and philosophical 'levels' within psychology were outlined and examined. These included: the prospects for theoretical unity in psychology; the distinction between 'pure' and 'applied' psychology; difficulties with the concepts of 'consciousness' and 'perception'; and theories concerning the nature and status of knowledge in psychology. In each of these areas reflexive problems were found that originated in two incommensurable versions of the concept of 'meaning': meaning as reference and meaning as an activity or use over time. Radical behaviourism, despite its uniqueness, was found to be unable to resolve these difficulties, especially in its characterization of 'private events'. Ludwig Wittgenstein's investigations into the limits of sense were found to provide a way to reconcile the two versions of meaning and to thus resolve reflexive problems. It was concluded that reflexive problems must be approached grammatically if any sense is to be made of them. Therefore, psychological theories can be understood as language-games which both explore and provide 'training' in the grammatical possibilities of human action. Finally, it was claimed that reflexivity should be understood grammatically and not as a psychological (orcausal) ability or process. Thus theorizing in psychology has an unavoidable grammatical aspect. In this aspect the study of psychology finds a clear home in the world of 'ordinary', meaningful human action.University of Canterbury. Psychology2011-11-17T20:06:59Z2011-11-17T20:06:59Z1990Electronic thesis or dissertationTexthttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/5823enNZCUCopyright Kevin Moorehttp://library.canterbury.ac.nz/thesis/etheses_copyright.shtml
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
description The seemingly endless possibility of reflecting upon psychological theories and 'knowledge' has created an intractable difficulty in understanding what psychology is about and what it produces. This 'problem of reflexivity' was therefore adopted as the focus of this dissertation. The aim was to determine whether it is possible for psychology to be understood clearly without ignoring or denying the 'problem of reflexivity'. Selected dichotomies and debates representative of various subject areas and theoretical and philosophical 'levels' within psychology were outlined and examined. These included: the prospects for theoretical unity in psychology; the distinction between 'pure' and 'applied' psychology; difficulties with the concepts of 'consciousness' and 'perception'; and theories concerning the nature and status of knowledge in psychology. In each of these areas reflexive problems were found that originated in two incommensurable versions of the concept of 'meaning': meaning as reference and meaning as an activity or use over time. Radical behaviourism, despite its uniqueness, was found to be unable to resolve these difficulties, especially in its characterization of 'private events'. Ludwig Wittgenstein's investigations into the limits of sense were found to provide a way to reconcile the two versions of meaning and to thus resolve reflexive problems. It was concluded that reflexive problems must be approached grammatically if any sense is to be made of them. Therefore, psychological theories can be understood as language-games which both explore and provide 'training' in the grammatical possibilities of human action. Finally, it was claimed that reflexivity should be understood grammatically and not as a psychological (orcausal) ability or process. Thus theorizing in psychology has an unavoidable grammatical aspect. In this aspect the study of psychology finds a clear home in the world of 'ordinary', meaningful human action.
author Moore, Kevin
spellingShingle Moore, Kevin
Reflexivity and psychology : an unresolved dilemma.
author_facet Moore, Kevin
author_sort Moore, Kevin
title Reflexivity and psychology : an unresolved dilemma.
title_short Reflexivity and psychology : an unresolved dilemma.
title_full Reflexivity and psychology : an unresolved dilemma.
title_fullStr Reflexivity and psychology : an unresolved dilemma.
title_full_unstemmed Reflexivity and psychology : an unresolved dilemma.
title_sort reflexivity and psychology : an unresolved dilemma.
publisher University of Canterbury. Psychology
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/5823
work_keys_str_mv AT moorekevin reflexivityandpsychologyanunresolveddilemma
_version_ 1716799413709438976