NEMP assessment and children with special needs : research project report.
Since 1995 educational achievement in New Zealand primary schools at year four and year eight has been examined and reported on by the National Education Monitoring Project (NEMP). Prior to this New Zealand students had participated in international educational studies that provided information in s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | en |
Published: |
University of Canterbury. School of Educational Studies and Human Development
2009
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/2768 |
Summary: | Since 1995 educational achievement in New Zealand primary schools at
year four and year eight has been examined and reported on by the
National Education Monitoring Project (NEMP). Prior to this New
Zealand students had participated in international educational studies that
provided information in some curriculum areas. The aim ofNEMP was to
gather information about the educational achievements ofNew Zealand
pupils within the context ofNew Zealand education.
This study looked specifically at the pupils involved in NEMP who are
classified as special care (special needs), having physical or intellectual
disabilities. The major questions explored were: 1) How do schools make
decisions about which children will participate in NEMP studies? 2)
What processes do schools go through in deciding whether to include or
exclude students (in particular those defined as special care)? 3) How
well does NEMP cater for the inclusion of students with physical and
intellectual needs?
Data was generated through phone interviews with seven Canterbury
schools, all of which had excluded or included (or both) children with
special needs in the 2001 NEMP process. The principle findings were
that; Schools have clearly established consultative processes that are used
in order to decide which children will participate in NEMP; The
importance of the random sample is recognised and respected by schools;
The support given to schools by NEMP is an important component in
ensuring the success of the process. |
---|