2D and 3D Geophysical Imaging of Polygonal Patterned Ground in the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica
The PPG found in the Dry Valleys is some of the oldest on the planet with ages of up to 8 million years assigned to them. The activity of some of these Antarctic PPG areas has come into question with the proposal that they may be the result of sublimation processes rather than actively re-working fr...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | en |
Published: |
University of Canterbury. Geological Sciences
2009
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/2255 |
Summary: | The PPG found in the Dry Valleys is some of the oldest on the planet with ages of up
to 8 million years assigned to them. The activity of some of these Antarctic PPG areas
has come into question with the proposal that they may be the result of sublimation
processes rather than actively re-working freeze and thaw processes.
Near surface geophysical methods of ground penetrating radar (GPR), resistivity
tomography and electromagnetism have been applied to four Antarctic Dry Valleys
polygonal patterned ground (PPG) areas; two in Victoria Valley and two in Beacon
Valley. The aim was to resolve subsurface structure and activity of the PPG without
disturbing the delicate permafrost soils.
Multiple techniques were used so that there could be greater reliability on the
interpretations of this data without the need for damaging subsurface geological
calibration of the geophysics by obtaining direct subsurface data through methods
such as trenching or drilling.
Subsurface structure of the PPG was resolved; active layer depth, deformation of
permafrost in the vicinity of contraction cracks and zones of attenuation were
identified. Significant deformation in the subsurface horizons of the permafrost and
associated with thermal contraction crack wedge growth was identified over PPG
suggested to be formed only by sublimation in Beacon Valley, thus calling into
question this interpretation of the PPG activity.
The most reliable identification of subsurface features occurred with correlation
between GPR and resistivity tomography results. |
---|