Arboreal Eloquence: Trees and Commemoration

This thesis is about the use of trees for commemoration and the memory that they have anchored in the landscape. There has been little written on the use of trees for commemorative purposes despite its symbolic resonance over the last 150 years. To determine the extent to which commemorative trees...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morgan, Jo-anne Mary
Language:en
Published: University of Canterbury. Geography 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/1990
id ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-1990
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-19902015-03-30T15:30:10ZArboreal Eloquence: Trees and CommemorationMorgan, Jo-anne Marycommemorative treesmemorylandscaperoyaltyplaceArbor Daymemorial avenuesFirst World WarThis thesis is about the use of trees for commemoration and the memory that they have anchored in the landscape. There has been little written on the use of trees for commemorative purposes despite its symbolic resonance over the last 150 years. To determine the extent to which commemorative trees have been employed, the social practice and context in which the trees were planted, field and archival work was undertaken in New Zealand and Australia. This has been supported with some comparative work using examples from Britain and the United States of America. The research also utilizes the new availabilities of records on-line and the community interests that placed historical and contemporary material on-line. The commemorative tree has been a popular commemorative marker for royal events, the marking of place and as memorial for war dead. It has been as effective an anchor of memory in the landscape as any other form. The memory ascribed to these trees must be understood in terms of the era in which the tree was planted and not just from a distance. Over time the memory represented by the trees and its prescribed meanings, has changed. For all its power and fragility, memory is not permanent but nor is it so ephemeral as to exhibit no robustness at all. Instead memory exists in a state of instability that leaves it open to challenge and to constant reassessment based on the needs of the viewing generation. This instability also allows the memory, and thus the tree, to fade and become part of the domestic landscape of treescape memories (Cloke and Pawson, 2008). However, in some circumstances trees are retrieved and reinscribed with specific memory and made relevant for a new generation. The landscape created by commemorative trees is, therefore, multifunctional, in which social relations support memory, remembrance, forgetting, silences, erasures, and memory slippage.University of Canterbury. Geography2009-01-14T20:17:15Z2009-01-14T20:17:15Z2008Electronic thesis or dissertationTexthttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/1990enNZCUCopyright Jo-anne Mary Morganhttp://library.canterbury.ac.nz/thesis/etheses_copyright.shtml
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic commemorative trees
memory
landscape
royalty
place
Arbor Day
memorial avenues
First World War
spellingShingle commemorative trees
memory
landscape
royalty
place
Arbor Day
memorial avenues
First World War
Morgan, Jo-anne Mary
Arboreal Eloquence: Trees and Commemoration
description This thesis is about the use of trees for commemoration and the memory that they have anchored in the landscape. There has been little written on the use of trees for commemorative purposes despite its symbolic resonance over the last 150 years. To determine the extent to which commemorative trees have been employed, the social practice and context in which the trees were planted, field and archival work was undertaken in New Zealand and Australia. This has been supported with some comparative work using examples from Britain and the United States of America. The research also utilizes the new availabilities of records on-line and the community interests that placed historical and contemporary material on-line. The commemorative tree has been a popular commemorative marker for royal events, the marking of place and as memorial for war dead. It has been as effective an anchor of memory in the landscape as any other form. The memory ascribed to these trees must be understood in terms of the era in which the tree was planted and not just from a distance. Over time the memory represented by the trees and its prescribed meanings, has changed. For all its power and fragility, memory is not permanent but nor is it so ephemeral as to exhibit no robustness at all. Instead memory exists in a state of instability that leaves it open to challenge and to constant reassessment based on the needs of the viewing generation. This instability also allows the memory, and thus the tree, to fade and become part of the domestic landscape of treescape memories (Cloke and Pawson, 2008). However, in some circumstances trees are retrieved and reinscribed with specific memory and made relevant for a new generation. The landscape created by commemorative trees is, therefore, multifunctional, in which social relations support memory, remembrance, forgetting, silences, erasures, and memory slippage.
author Morgan, Jo-anne Mary
author_facet Morgan, Jo-anne Mary
author_sort Morgan, Jo-anne Mary
title Arboreal Eloquence: Trees and Commemoration
title_short Arboreal Eloquence: Trees and Commemoration
title_full Arboreal Eloquence: Trees and Commemoration
title_fullStr Arboreal Eloquence: Trees and Commemoration
title_full_unstemmed Arboreal Eloquence: Trees and Commemoration
title_sort arboreal eloquence: trees and commemoration
publisher University of Canterbury. Geography
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/1990
work_keys_str_mv AT morganjoannemary arborealeloquencetreesandcommemoration
_version_ 1716799170824634368