Biodiversity conservation and evolutionary models

Biodiversity conservation requires a framework for prioritising limited resources to the many endangered species. One such framework that has seen much attention and is considered extensively in this thesis, is the Noah's Ark Problem (NAP). The NAP combines a biodiversity measure (Phylogenetic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hartmann, Klaas
Language:en
Published: University of Canterbury. Mathematics and Statistics 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/1776
id ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-1776
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-17762015-03-30T15:30:10ZBiodiversity conservation and evolutionary modelsHartmann, Klaasbiodiversityconservationmanagementphylogeneticsevolutionary modelsNoah's Ark Problemphylogenetic diversityresource allocationtree balanceextinctionendangered speciesBiodiversity conservation requires a framework for prioritising limited resources to the many endangered species. One such framework that has seen much attention and is considered extensively in this thesis, is the Noah's Ark Problem (NAP). The NAP combines a biodiversity measure (Phylogenetic Diversity; PD) with species survival probabilities and conservation costs. The aim of the NAP is to allocate the limited conservation resources such that the future expected PD is maximised. Obtaining optimal solutions to the NAP is a computationally complex problem to which several efficient algorithms are provided here. An extension to the NAP is also developed which allows uncertainty about the survival probability estimates to be included. Using this extension we show that the NAP is robust to uncertainty in these parameters and that even very poor estimates are beneficial. To justify using or promoting PD, it must produce a significant increase in the amount of biodiversity that is preserved. We show that the increase attainable from the NAP is typically around 20% but may be as high as 150%. An alternative approach to PD and the NAP is to prioritise species using simple species specific indices. The benefit of these indices is that they are easy to calculate, explain and integrate into existing management frameworks. Here we investigate the use of such indices and show that they provide between 60% and 80% of the gains obtainable using PD. To explore the expected behaviours of conservation methods (such as the NAP) a distribution of phylogenetics trees is required. Evolutionary models describe the diversification process by which a single species gives rise to multiple species. Such models induce a probability distribution on trees and can therefore be used to investigate the expected behaviour of conservation methods. Even simple and widely used models, such as the Yule model, remain poorly understood. In this thesis we present some new analytic results and methods for sampling trees from a broad range of evolutionary models. Lastly we introduce a new model that provides a simple biological explanation for a long standing discrepancy between models and trees derived from real data -- the tree balance distribution.University of Canterbury. Mathematics and Statistics2008-11-10T01:26:00Z2008-11-10T01:26:00Z2008Electronic thesis or dissertationTexthttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/1776enNZCUCopyright Klaas Hartmannhttp://library.canterbury.ac.nz/thesis/etheses_copyright.shtml
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic biodiversity
conservation
management
phylogenetics
evolutionary models
Noah's Ark Problem
phylogenetic diversity
resource allocation
tree balance
extinction
endangered species
spellingShingle biodiversity
conservation
management
phylogenetics
evolutionary models
Noah's Ark Problem
phylogenetic diversity
resource allocation
tree balance
extinction
endangered species
Hartmann, Klaas
Biodiversity conservation and evolutionary models
description Biodiversity conservation requires a framework for prioritising limited resources to the many endangered species. One such framework that has seen much attention and is considered extensively in this thesis, is the Noah's Ark Problem (NAP). The NAP combines a biodiversity measure (Phylogenetic Diversity; PD) with species survival probabilities and conservation costs. The aim of the NAP is to allocate the limited conservation resources such that the future expected PD is maximised. Obtaining optimal solutions to the NAP is a computationally complex problem to which several efficient algorithms are provided here. An extension to the NAP is also developed which allows uncertainty about the survival probability estimates to be included. Using this extension we show that the NAP is robust to uncertainty in these parameters and that even very poor estimates are beneficial. To justify using or promoting PD, it must produce a significant increase in the amount of biodiversity that is preserved. We show that the increase attainable from the NAP is typically around 20% but may be as high as 150%. An alternative approach to PD and the NAP is to prioritise species using simple species specific indices. The benefit of these indices is that they are easy to calculate, explain and integrate into existing management frameworks. Here we investigate the use of such indices and show that they provide between 60% and 80% of the gains obtainable using PD. To explore the expected behaviours of conservation methods (such as the NAP) a distribution of phylogenetics trees is required. Evolutionary models describe the diversification process by which a single species gives rise to multiple species. Such models induce a probability distribution on trees and can therefore be used to investigate the expected behaviour of conservation methods. Even simple and widely used models, such as the Yule model, remain poorly understood. In this thesis we present some new analytic results and methods for sampling trees from a broad range of evolutionary models. Lastly we introduce a new model that provides a simple biological explanation for a long standing discrepancy between models and trees derived from real data -- the tree balance distribution.
author Hartmann, Klaas
author_facet Hartmann, Klaas
author_sort Hartmann, Klaas
title Biodiversity conservation and evolutionary models
title_short Biodiversity conservation and evolutionary models
title_full Biodiversity conservation and evolutionary models
title_fullStr Biodiversity conservation and evolutionary models
title_full_unstemmed Biodiversity conservation and evolutionary models
title_sort biodiversity conservation and evolutionary models
publisher University of Canterbury. Mathematics and Statistics
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/1776
work_keys_str_mv AT hartmannklaas biodiversityconservationandevolutionarymodels
_version_ 1716799157367209984