A comparative study of mechanized cable harvesting systems in New Zealand

Productivity and safety concerns of traditional cable harvesting systems have been the key drivers for increasing levels of mechanisation in New Zealand. The use of grapples in cable yarding could eliminate the need for motor-manual tree fallers and breaker-outs in most situations. A comparative tim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nuske, Samuel Ryan
Language:en
Published: University of Canterbury. School of Forestry 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/10471
id ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-10471
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-104712015-07-03T03:27:24ZA comparative study of mechanized cable harvesting systems in New ZealandNuske, Samuel Ryanmechanised cable harvestinggrapple carriagecable harvestingmotorised grapple carriagelive skylinerunning skylinesurgepileProductivity and safety concerns of traditional cable harvesting systems have been the key drivers for increasing levels of mechanisation in New Zealand. The use of grapples in cable yarding could eliminate the need for motor-manual tree fallers and breaker-outs in most situations. A comparative time study was carried out on two mechanised cable harvesting systems utilising grapple carriages in an attempt to better understand the benefits and limitations of each system in different harvest settings. These systems include the Mechanical system which involved a swing yarder operating a mechanical grapple carriage and the Motorised system, which used a tower yarder with a motorised grapple carriage. The Mechanical system took less time to accumulate felled trees but took longer to unhook trees on the landing than the Motorised system. The Mechanical system had a shorter cycle time (2.07 minutes) than the Motorised system (2.32 minutes) and extracted 1.3 tonnes more than the Motorised system per cycle. The Motorised system had shorter cycle times when in horizontal haul distances of less than 90 metres, but had the longest times when the distance exceeded this. Utilisation rates were similar between the two systems, although the main difference in delays between the two systems was the use of surgepiles on the landing by the Motorised system. Both systems were effective, although on average the Mechanical system was more productive, with a productivity of 45 t/SMH, compared to 40 t/SMH for the Motorised system. The Mechanical system was the most productive when extracting mechanically felled and pre-bunched or trees while the Motorised system was the most productive when extracting motor-manually felled trees. Pre-bunching with an excavator was a more cost effective method than handing stems directly to the grapple carriage. Further research of the Mechanical system under more adverse conditions would allow a better overall comparison.University of Canterbury. School of Forestry2015-06-01T22:06:16Z2014Electronic thesis or dissertationTexthttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/10471enNZCUCopyright Samuel Nuskehttp://library.canterbury.ac.nz/thesis/etheses_copyright.shtml
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic mechanised cable harvesting
grapple carriage
cable harvesting
motorised grapple carriage
live skyline
running skyline
surgepile
spellingShingle mechanised cable harvesting
grapple carriage
cable harvesting
motorised grapple carriage
live skyline
running skyline
surgepile
Nuske, Samuel Ryan
A comparative study of mechanized cable harvesting systems in New Zealand
description Productivity and safety concerns of traditional cable harvesting systems have been the key drivers for increasing levels of mechanisation in New Zealand. The use of grapples in cable yarding could eliminate the need for motor-manual tree fallers and breaker-outs in most situations. A comparative time study was carried out on two mechanised cable harvesting systems utilising grapple carriages in an attempt to better understand the benefits and limitations of each system in different harvest settings. These systems include the Mechanical system which involved a swing yarder operating a mechanical grapple carriage and the Motorised system, which used a tower yarder with a motorised grapple carriage. The Mechanical system took less time to accumulate felled trees but took longer to unhook trees on the landing than the Motorised system. The Mechanical system had a shorter cycle time (2.07 minutes) than the Motorised system (2.32 minutes) and extracted 1.3 tonnes more than the Motorised system per cycle. The Motorised system had shorter cycle times when in horizontal haul distances of less than 90 metres, but had the longest times when the distance exceeded this. Utilisation rates were similar between the two systems, although the main difference in delays between the two systems was the use of surgepiles on the landing by the Motorised system. Both systems were effective, although on average the Mechanical system was more productive, with a productivity of 45 t/SMH, compared to 40 t/SMH for the Motorised system. The Mechanical system was the most productive when extracting mechanically felled and pre-bunched or trees while the Motorised system was the most productive when extracting motor-manually felled trees. Pre-bunching with an excavator was a more cost effective method than handing stems directly to the grapple carriage. Further research of the Mechanical system under more adverse conditions would allow a better overall comparison.
author Nuske, Samuel Ryan
author_facet Nuske, Samuel Ryan
author_sort Nuske, Samuel Ryan
title A comparative study of mechanized cable harvesting systems in New Zealand
title_short A comparative study of mechanized cable harvesting systems in New Zealand
title_full A comparative study of mechanized cable harvesting systems in New Zealand
title_fullStr A comparative study of mechanized cable harvesting systems in New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of mechanized cable harvesting systems in New Zealand
title_sort comparative study of mechanized cable harvesting systems in new zealand
publisher University of Canterbury. School of Forestry
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/10471
work_keys_str_mv AT nuskesamuelryan acomparativestudyofmechanizedcableharvestingsystemsinnewzealand
AT nuskesamuelryan comparativestudyofmechanizedcableharvestingsystemsinnewzealand
_version_ 1716807712378978304