Fair play, white advantage, and black reparations

This dissertation advances a new argumentative approach to the political problem of black reparations in the contemporary United States appealing to the normative principle of fair play. Among its core presumptions is the view that getting appreciable numbers of white Americans to acknowledge what I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frigault, Joseph
Other Authors: Cudd, Ann E.
Language:en_US
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2144/41568
id ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-41568
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-415682020-11-03T17:01:24Z Fair play, white advantage, and black reparations Frigault, Joseph Cudd, Ann E. Lyons, David B. Philosophy Advantage Fairness Free-riding Privilege Reparations Whiteness This dissertation advances a new argumentative approach to the political problem of black reparations in the contemporary United States appealing to the normative principle of fair play. Among its core presumptions is the view that getting appreciable numbers of white Americans to acknowledge what I call the primary normative case for black reparations will require, among other things, a new kind of discursive move, namely: the deployment of an intermediary case designed to facilitate recognition of the primary one. The two central tasks of my dissertation are to establish the need for such an intermediary case, and to make it via my novel fair play argument. My approach to fair play reasoning involves three main innovations: First, I introduce the possibility of deploying that framework in a corrective mode, to ground redistributive obligations on the part of members of systemically advantaged groups, but which do not imply guilt or blame. Second, in arguing for that deployment, I offer a novel conception of free-riding which I call externalist insofar as it defines the latter without reference to the relevant agents’ mental states. Third, I argue that in a range of cases those corrective obligations of fair play can qualify as reparative despite the fact that their normative force is not determined by direct reference to any discrete wrong, or what I call extrinsically reparative. A key plank of my proposal is the empirical claim that the lens of fair play is better suited to overcoming many of the moral and social psychological obstacles that have long plagued political progress on black reparations in the U.S. I defend this claim by drawing upon various strands of the empirical literature on white racial identity in connection with attitudes toward race-sensitive social policies generally. I argue that it is only upon being safely confronted with the details of how their very whiteness precipitates the nonvoluntary receipt of various unearned material advantages that white Americans will begin to perceive their own personal involvement in America’s long history of racial injustice, and feel a new kind of pressure to do something about it. 2021-10-29T00:00:00Z 2020-10-30T18:45:52Z 2020 2020-10-29T22:02:30Z Thesis/Dissertation https://hdl.handle.net/2144/41568 0000-0002-8810-8715 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Philosophy
Advantage
Fairness
Free-riding
Privilege
Reparations
Whiteness
spellingShingle Philosophy
Advantage
Fairness
Free-riding
Privilege
Reparations
Whiteness
Frigault, Joseph
Fair play, white advantage, and black reparations
description This dissertation advances a new argumentative approach to the political problem of black reparations in the contemporary United States appealing to the normative principle of fair play. Among its core presumptions is the view that getting appreciable numbers of white Americans to acknowledge what I call the primary normative case for black reparations will require, among other things, a new kind of discursive move, namely: the deployment of an intermediary case designed to facilitate recognition of the primary one. The two central tasks of my dissertation are to establish the need for such an intermediary case, and to make it via my novel fair play argument. My approach to fair play reasoning involves three main innovations: First, I introduce the possibility of deploying that framework in a corrective mode, to ground redistributive obligations on the part of members of systemically advantaged groups, but which do not imply guilt or blame. Second, in arguing for that deployment, I offer a novel conception of free-riding which I call externalist insofar as it defines the latter without reference to the relevant agents’ mental states. Third, I argue that in a range of cases those corrective obligations of fair play can qualify as reparative despite the fact that their normative force is not determined by direct reference to any discrete wrong, or what I call extrinsically reparative. A key plank of my proposal is the empirical claim that the lens of fair play is better suited to overcoming many of the moral and social psychological obstacles that have long plagued political progress on black reparations in the U.S. I defend this claim by drawing upon various strands of the empirical literature on white racial identity in connection with attitudes toward race-sensitive social policies generally. I argue that it is only upon being safely confronted with the details of how their very whiteness precipitates the nonvoluntary receipt of various unearned material advantages that white Americans will begin to perceive their own personal involvement in America’s long history of racial injustice, and feel a new kind of pressure to do something about it. === 2021-10-29T00:00:00Z
author2 Cudd, Ann E.
author_facet Cudd, Ann E.
Frigault, Joseph
author Frigault, Joseph
author_sort Frigault, Joseph
title Fair play, white advantage, and black reparations
title_short Fair play, white advantage, and black reparations
title_full Fair play, white advantage, and black reparations
title_fullStr Fair play, white advantage, and black reparations
title_full_unstemmed Fair play, white advantage, and black reparations
title_sort fair play, white advantage, and black reparations
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/2144/41568
work_keys_str_mv AT frigaultjoseph fairplaywhiteadvantageandblackreparations
_version_ 1719354800316874752