Analyzing ancestry: craniometric variation in two contemporary Caribbean populations

Ancestry estimation of skeletonized remains by forensic anthropologists is conducted through comparative means, and a lack of population-specific data results in possible misclassifications. This is especially germane to individuals of Latin American ancestry. Generally, each country in Latin Americ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Herrera, Michelle Denise
Other Authors: Tallman, Sean D.
Language:en_US
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2144/38664
id ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-38664
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-386642019-12-07T03:03:21Z Analyzing ancestry: craniometric variation in two contemporary Caribbean populations Herrera, Michelle Denise Tallman, Sean D. Reinecke, Gary Forensic anthropology Ancestry estimation Computed tomography Dominican Republic Forensic anthropology Haiti Ancestry estimation of skeletonized remains by forensic anthropologists is conducted through comparative means, and a lack of population-specific data results in possible misclassifications. This is especially germane to individuals of Latin American ancestry. Generally, each country in Latin America can trace their ancestry to three parental groups: Indigenous, European, and African. However, grouping all Latin American individuals together under the broad “Hispanic” category ignores the specific genetic contributions from each parental group, which is variable and dependent on the population histories and sociocultural dynamics of each country. This study analyzes the craniometric ancestry of Hispaniola (the Dominican Republic and Haiti) using the island’s history, along with 190 cranial Computed Tomography (CT) scans (f = 103; m = 87), to determine similarities and differences between the two groups. A total of 12 linear discriminant function analyses produced cross-validated classification accuracies of 75.0 – 83.3% for females, 71.8 – 87.5% for males, and 72.0 – 82.2% for pooled sexes. This study demonstrates that, despite sharing a small island, Dominican and Haitian individuals can be differentiated with a fair amount of statistical certainty, which is possible due to complex socio-cultural, -political, and –demographic factors that have maintained genetic heterogeneity. Moreover, the discriminant functions provided here can be used by the international forensic science community to identify individuals living on Hispaniola. 2019-12-04T16:03:24Z 2019-12-04T16:03:24Z 2019 2019-10-10T01:02:48Z Thesis/Dissertation https://hdl.handle.net/2144/38664 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Forensic anthropology
Ancestry estimation
Computed tomography
Dominican Republic
Forensic anthropology
Haiti
spellingShingle Forensic anthropology
Ancestry estimation
Computed tomography
Dominican Republic
Forensic anthropology
Haiti
Herrera, Michelle Denise
Analyzing ancestry: craniometric variation in two contemporary Caribbean populations
description Ancestry estimation of skeletonized remains by forensic anthropologists is conducted through comparative means, and a lack of population-specific data results in possible misclassifications. This is especially germane to individuals of Latin American ancestry. Generally, each country in Latin America can trace their ancestry to three parental groups: Indigenous, European, and African. However, grouping all Latin American individuals together under the broad “Hispanic” category ignores the specific genetic contributions from each parental group, which is variable and dependent on the population histories and sociocultural dynamics of each country. This study analyzes the craniometric ancestry of Hispaniola (the Dominican Republic and Haiti) using the island’s history, along with 190 cranial Computed Tomography (CT) scans (f = 103; m = 87), to determine similarities and differences between the two groups. A total of 12 linear discriminant function analyses produced cross-validated classification accuracies of 75.0 – 83.3% for females, 71.8 – 87.5% for males, and 72.0 – 82.2% for pooled sexes. This study demonstrates that, despite sharing a small island, Dominican and Haitian individuals can be differentiated with a fair amount of statistical certainty, which is possible due to complex socio-cultural, -political, and –demographic factors that have maintained genetic heterogeneity. Moreover, the discriminant functions provided here can be used by the international forensic science community to identify individuals living on Hispaniola.
author2 Tallman, Sean D.
author_facet Tallman, Sean D.
Herrera, Michelle Denise
author Herrera, Michelle Denise
author_sort Herrera, Michelle Denise
title Analyzing ancestry: craniometric variation in two contemporary Caribbean populations
title_short Analyzing ancestry: craniometric variation in two contemporary Caribbean populations
title_full Analyzing ancestry: craniometric variation in two contemporary Caribbean populations
title_fullStr Analyzing ancestry: craniometric variation in two contemporary Caribbean populations
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing ancestry: craniometric variation in two contemporary Caribbean populations
title_sort analyzing ancestry: craniometric variation in two contemporary caribbean populations
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/2144/38664
work_keys_str_mv AT herreramichelledenise analyzingancestrycraniometricvariationintwocontemporarycaribbeanpopulations
_version_ 1719302201069797376