Assistive technology recommendations: measuring device use, discontinuance, and client satisfaction in rehabilitation settings

INTRODUCTION: Device discontinuance is a widespread problem with assistive technology (AT) and durable medical equipment (DME), affecting approximately one third of people with disabilities who successfully acquire equipment. Consumers’ dissatisfaction with service and device-related factors can dir...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Primeau, Casey A.
Other Authors: Cohn, Ellen S.
Language:en_US
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2144/38143
id ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-38143
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-381432019-12-07T03:03:11Z Assistive technology recommendations: measuring device use, discontinuance, and client satisfaction in rehabilitation settings Primeau, Casey A. Cohn, Ellen S. Occupational therapy Assistive technology Discontinuance Durable medical equipment Feasibility Follow-up Non-use INTRODUCTION: Device discontinuance is a widespread problem with assistive technology (AT) and durable medical equipment (DME), affecting approximately one third of people with disabilities who successfully acquire equipment. Consumers’ dissatisfaction with service and device-related factors can directly lead to AT device non-use. Roger’s Diffusion of Innovation Theory provides a foundation for understanding how to address device discontinuance, potentially through follow-up services. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this doctoral capstone is to discuss the piloting and feasibility of using follow-up outcome measures in an outpatient occupational therapy rehabilitation setting in order to identify and address challenges with equipment discontinuance. METHODS: A sample of 69 clients receiving equipment recommendations from a specialty AT clinic were contacted. The COPM, ATUFS, and QUEST 2.0 were piloted to measure device use and satisfaction. The feasibility of using these measures within a follow-up protocol for this outpatient practice was then evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 63% of the sample (N=69) was successfully contacted. The site-specific protocol successfully determined whether these clients had acquired and used their devices, subsequently allowing AT practitioners to provide additional supports for clients who had experienced discontinuance or non-acquisition. CONCLUSION: Using standardized outcome measures to follow-up with clients in this setting was deemed not feasible secondary to time constraints and difficulty contacting clients. Recommendations for improving follow-up with and without use of standardized measures is discussed. Follow-up encouraged clients to schedule additional appointments, utilize recommended funding resources, or seek out referrals. 2019-10-01T13:24:41Z 2019-10-01T13:24:41Z 2019 2019-09-29T01:00:49Z Thesis/Dissertation https://hdl.handle.net/2144/38143 0000-0002-0698-697X en_US Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Occupational therapy
Assistive technology
Discontinuance
Durable medical equipment
Feasibility
Follow-up
Non-use
spellingShingle Occupational therapy
Assistive technology
Discontinuance
Durable medical equipment
Feasibility
Follow-up
Non-use
Primeau, Casey A.
Assistive technology recommendations: measuring device use, discontinuance, and client satisfaction in rehabilitation settings
description INTRODUCTION: Device discontinuance is a widespread problem with assistive technology (AT) and durable medical equipment (DME), affecting approximately one third of people with disabilities who successfully acquire equipment. Consumers’ dissatisfaction with service and device-related factors can directly lead to AT device non-use. Roger’s Diffusion of Innovation Theory provides a foundation for understanding how to address device discontinuance, potentially through follow-up services. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this doctoral capstone is to discuss the piloting and feasibility of using follow-up outcome measures in an outpatient occupational therapy rehabilitation setting in order to identify and address challenges with equipment discontinuance. METHODS: A sample of 69 clients receiving equipment recommendations from a specialty AT clinic were contacted. The COPM, ATUFS, and QUEST 2.0 were piloted to measure device use and satisfaction. The feasibility of using these measures within a follow-up protocol for this outpatient practice was then evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 63% of the sample (N=69) was successfully contacted. The site-specific protocol successfully determined whether these clients had acquired and used their devices, subsequently allowing AT practitioners to provide additional supports for clients who had experienced discontinuance or non-acquisition. CONCLUSION: Using standardized outcome measures to follow-up with clients in this setting was deemed not feasible secondary to time constraints and difficulty contacting clients. Recommendations for improving follow-up with and without use of standardized measures is discussed. Follow-up encouraged clients to schedule additional appointments, utilize recommended funding resources, or seek out referrals.
author2 Cohn, Ellen S.
author_facet Cohn, Ellen S.
Primeau, Casey A.
author Primeau, Casey A.
author_sort Primeau, Casey A.
title Assistive technology recommendations: measuring device use, discontinuance, and client satisfaction in rehabilitation settings
title_short Assistive technology recommendations: measuring device use, discontinuance, and client satisfaction in rehabilitation settings
title_full Assistive technology recommendations: measuring device use, discontinuance, and client satisfaction in rehabilitation settings
title_fullStr Assistive technology recommendations: measuring device use, discontinuance, and client satisfaction in rehabilitation settings
title_full_unstemmed Assistive technology recommendations: measuring device use, discontinuance, and client satisfaction in rehabilitation settings
title_sort assistive technology recommendations: measuring device use, discontinuance, and client satisfaction in rehabilitation settings
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/2144/38143
work_keys_str_mv AT primeaucaseya assistivetechnologyrecommendationsmeasuringdeviceusediscontinuanceandclientsatisfactioninrehabilitationsettings
_version_ 1719302157832814592