| Summary: | Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University. === The goal of this dissertation is two-fold. It is, first, to reconstruct
Kant's argument against self-murder, and, second, to analyze the function of the principle of self preservation of reason
with regard to the prohibition of self-murder. I argue that self-murder is contrary to the principle of self-preservation of
reason and violates the trustee-relationship between the homo phaenomenon and the homo noumenon. The analysis shows that moral
self-preservation in Kant is a rational principle which serves to secure the possibility of moral faith and self-perfection. In
the first part of the dissertation, I provide a comprehensive analysis of Kant's argument against self-murder by examining all
of the relevant statements in his works, the Nachlab , as well as the lectures recorded by Herder, Powalski, Collins, and
Vigilantius. Since self-murder violates a perfect duty to oneself, key topics of the analysis are: the dual status of the duty
of self-preservation as both inner duty of right and duty of virtue, the right and end of humanity, as well as Kant's model of
self-possession in terms of proprietas. The analysis makes clear that self-murder destroys the moral self and must be
distinguished from sacrificing one's life in order to preserve one's moral integrity. [truncated]
|
|---|
