Prophylactic removal of third molars: a risk-benefit analysis
The treatment of impacted third molars that have neither symptoms nor disease is controversial. One school of thought is that these teeth should be extracted before they do become symptomatic and/or diseased. A second school of thought advocates retaining these teeth until such time when they show e...
Main Author: | Tesone, Francesca Marie |
---|---|
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/2144/17146 |
Similar Items
-
Prophylactic removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a systematic review and economic evaluation
by: Juliet Hounsome, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
by: Moacir Guilherme da Costa, et al.
Published: (2013-04-01) -
Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review
by: Moacir Guilherme da Costa, et al.
Published: (2013-04-01) -
Third Molar Removal and Orofacial Pain: a Population-Based Survey
by: Laura J. Stevenson, et al.
Published: (2010-07-01) -
The incidence and extraction causes of third molars among young adults in Poland
by: Tomaszewska Agnieszka, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)