Success of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling

This consecutive nonrandomized comparative interventional study was designed to examine the association between pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the treatment of idiopathic macular holes (IMH). The ILM is the innermost layer of the retina. The m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Levitt, Eli
Language:en_US
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Eye
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2144/16759
id ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-16759
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-167592019-01-08T15:38:36Z Success of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling Levitt, Eli Medicine Eye Idiopathic macular hole Internal limiting membrane Macular hole surgery Ophthalmology Retina This consecutive nonrandomized comparative interventional study was designed to examine the association between pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the treatment of idiopathic macular holes (IMH). The ILM is the innermost layer of the retina. The macula is located within the retina, and is responsible for central vision. Although IMH manifests in a relatively small region within the retina, patients notice significant drops in visual acuity up to the 20/400 - 20/800 level (legally blind in the affected eye). In the literature, the anatomic success rate of macular hole surgery has been reported between 48% - 94%. To best treat idiopathic macular holes, it is imperative that physicians have access to the most up-to-date information regarding the treatment outcomes. This study included 55 eyes of 52 patients who received surgery at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for idiopathic macular holes between December 1999 and January 2015. Patients were non-randomly assigned to PPV with or without ILM peeling. Early patients did not receive ILM peeling, while more recent patients did. The primary endpoint measured was macular hole (MH) status as established by ocular coherence tomography (OCT) within 6 to 12 months of the vii procedure. 36 out of 39 (92.3%) eyes in the ILM peeling group had closed MH. In the comparison group without ILM peeling, 11 out of 16 (68.8%) eyes had closed MH. In comparison to the conventional PPV without ILM peeling, these findings suggest that PPV with ILM peeling is associated with a significantly higher anatomic success rate (OR, 5.45; [95% CI, 1.12 to 26.55]; P = 0.023). 2018-06-16T00:00:00Z 2016-06-29T16:01:07Z 2016 2016-06-17T00:12:50Z Thesis/Dissertation https://hdl.handle.net/2144/16759 en_US Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Medicine
Eye
Idiopathic macular hole
Internal limiting membrane
Macular hole surgery
Ophthalmology
Retina
spellingShingle Medicine
Eye
Idiopathic macular hole
Internal limiting membrane
Macular hole surgery
Ophthalmology
Retina
Levitt, Eli
Success of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
description This consecutive nonrandomized comparative interventional study was designed to examine the association between pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the treatment of idiopathic macular holes (IMH). The ILM is the innermost layer of the retina. The macula is located within the retina, and is responsible for central vision. Although IMH manifests in a relatively small region within the retina, patients notice significant drops in visual acuity up to the 20/400 - 20/800 level (legally blind in the affected eye). In the literature, the anatomic success rate of macular hole surgery has been reported between 48% - 94%. To best treat idiopathic macular holes, it is imperative that physicians have access to the most up-to-date information regarding the treatment outcomes. This study included 55 eyes of 52 patients who received surgery at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for idiopathic macular holes between December 1999 and January 2015. Patients were non-randomly assigned to PPV with or without ILM peeling. Early patients did not receive ILM peeling, while more recent patients did. The primary endpoint measured was macular hole (MH) status as established by ocular coherence tomography (OCT) within 6 to 12 months of the vii procedure. 36 out of 39 (92.3%) eyes in the ILM peeling group had closed MH. In the comparison group without ILM peeling, 11 out of 16 (68.8%) eyes had closed MH. In comparison to the conventional PPV without ILM peeling, these findings suggest that PPV with ILM peeling is associated with a significantly higher anatomic success rate (OR, 5.45; [95% CI, 1.12 to 26.55]; P = 0.023). === 2018-06-16T00:00:00Z
author Levitt, Eli
author_facet Levitt, Eli
author_sort Levitt, Eli
title Success of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
title_short Success of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
title_full Success of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
title_fullStr Success of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
title_full_unstemmed Success of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
title_sort success of macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/2144/16759
work_keys_str_mv AT levitteli successofmacularholesurgerywithorwithoutinternallimitingmembranepeeling
_version_ 1718811501066715136