Dynamics of hydrofracturing and microseismic signals in porous versus tight rocks

This work discusses the dynamic development of hydraulic fractures, their evolution and the resulting seismicity during fluid injection in a coupled numerical model. The model describes coupling between a solid that can fracture dynamically and a compressible fluid that can push back at the rock and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aleksans, Janis
Published: University of Glasgow 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.768782
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-768782
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7687822019-04-10T00:40:32ZDynamics of hydrofracturing and microseismic signals in porous versus tight rocksAleksans, Janis2019This work discusses the dynamic development of hydraulic fractures, their evolution and the resulting seismicity during fluid injection in a coupled numerical model. The model describes coupling between a solid that can fracture dynamically and a compressible fluid that can push back at the rock and open fractures. With a series of numerical simulations it is shown how the fracture pattern and seismicity change depending on changes in depth, injection rate, Young's modulus and breaking strength. Simulations indicate that the Young's modulus has the largest influence on the fracture dynamics and also the related seismicity. Simulations of rocks with a Young's modulus smaller than 10 GPa show dominant mode I failure and a growth of fracture aperture with a decrease in Young's modulus. Simulations of rocks with a Young's modulus higher than 10 GPa show fractures with a constant aperture and fracture growth that is mainly governed by a growth in crack length and an increasing amount of mode II failure. This change in fracture geometry evolution has an effect on the observed seismicity. Rocks with a Young's modulus of 10 GPa have the smallest moment magnitude while both decrease and increase of Young's modulus value contribute to a growth of the seismic moment magnitude. The signal is further altered by non-linear change in dip and tensile angle depending on the Young's modulus value. It is proposed that two distinct failure regimes are observed in the simulations. Below 10 GPa a fracture propagates through growth in aperture, this causes the fracture tip to be under constant extension. For rocks above 10 GPa, the aperture is small and the fracture is under compression. In this case fracture growth is driven by stress intensification at the crack tip, which causes fracture opening to have greater proportion of mode II compared to mode I. To suppliment the observations made from numerical simulations, laboratory experiments with air injection into vertically orientated Hele-Shaw cell were carried out. Strain analysis of the recorded experiments showed stress regimes that are very similar to the ones observed during numerical simulations with soft rocks. In both cases negative strain fields could be observed in front of the fracture tip. This indicates that fracture propagation for soft materials is driven by tensile failure and walls being pushed apart. Further analysis on fracture propagation mechanisms and solid media response were carried out. These results are applicable to the prediction of fracture dynamics and seismicity during fluid injection, especially since we see a transition from one failure regime to another at around 10 GPa, a Young's modulus that lies in the middle of possible values for natural shale rocks.QE GeologyUniversity of Glasgowhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.768782http://theses.gla.ac.uk/41079/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic QE Geology
spellingShingle QE Geology
Aleksans, Janis
Dynamics of hydrofracturing and microseismic signals in porous versus tight rocks
description This work discusses the dynamic development of hydraulic fractures, their evolution and the resulting seismicity during fluid injection in a coupled numerical model. The model describes coupling between a solid that can fracture dynamically and a compressible fluid that can push back at the rock and open fractures. With a series of numerical simulations it is shown how the fracture pattern and seismicity change depending on changes in depth, injection rate, Young's modulus and breaking strength. Simulations indicate that the Young's modulus has the largest influence on the fracture dynamics and also the related seismicity. Simulations of rocks with a Young's modulus smaller than 10 GPa show dominant mode I failure and a growth of fracture aperture with a decrease in Young's modulus. Simulations of rocks with a Young's modulus higher than 10 GPa show fractures with a constant aperture and fracture growth that is mainly governed by a growth in crack length and an increasing amount of mode II failure. This change in fracture geometry evolution has an effect on the observed seismicity. Rocks with a Young's modulus of 10 GPa have the smallest moment magnitude while both decrease and increase of Young's modulus value contribute to a growth of the seismic moment magnitude. The signal is further altered by non-linear change in dip and tensile angle depending on the Young's modulus value. It is proposed that two distinct failure regimes are observed in the simulations. Below 10 GPa a fracture propagates through growth in aperture, this causes the fracture tip to be under constant extension. For rocks above 10 GPa, the aperture is small and the fracture is under compression. In this case fracture growth is driven by stress intensification at the crack tip, which causes fracture opening to have greater proportion of mode II compared to mode I. To suppliment the observations made from numerical simulations, laboratory experiments with air injection into vertically orientated Hele-Shaw cell were carried out. Strain analysis of the recorded experiments showed stress regimes that are very similar to the ones observed during numerical simulations with soft rocks. In both cases negative strain fields could be observed in front of the fracture tip. This indicates that fracture propagation for soft materials is driven by tensile failure and walls being pushed apart. Further analysis on fracture propagation mechanisms and solid media response were carried out. These results are applicable to the prediction of fracture dynamics and seismicity during fluid injection, especially since we see a transition from one failure regime to another at around 10 GPa, a Young's modulus that lies in the middle of possible values for natural shale rocks.
author Aleksans, Janis
author_facet Aleksans, Janis
author_sort Aleksans, Janis
title Dynamics of hydrofracturing and microseismic signals in porous versus tight rocks
title_short Dynamics of hydrofracturing and microseismic signals in porous versus tight rocks
title_full Dynamics of hydrofracturing and microseismic signals in porous versus tight rocks
title_fullStr Dynamics of hydrofracturing and microseismic signals in porous versus tight rocks
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of hydrofracturing and microseismic signals in porous versus tight rocks
title_sort dynamics of hydrofracturing and microseismic signals in porous versus tight rocks
publisher University of Glasgow
publishDate 2019
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.768782
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksansjanis dynamicsofhydrofracturingandmicroseismicsignalsinporousversustightrocks
_version_ 1719016347017412608