Resolving the two impasses in the global justice debate through a reconstruction of David Miller's account of deliberative democracy on the basis of Habermas's conception of communicative action
There are both substantive and methodological disagreements in the global justice debate between cosmopolitanism on the one hand, and statism and liberal nationalism on the other. The substantive disagreement avers that statists and liberal nationalists restrict the regulation of substantive inequal...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Published: |
Durham University
2019
|
| Online Access: | https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.768383 |