The legitimacy of international law : re-examining the theory of state consent

With the post-WWII acceleration of globalisation and the proliferation of transnational concerns (such as nuclear armament, financial instability, climate change, the spread of diseases etc.), there has been a concomitant increase in international laws and institutions designed to regulate this acti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van-Rooyen, David Patrick
Published: Durham University 2019
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.768376
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-768376
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7683762019-04-03T06:25:31ZThe legitimacy of international law : re-examining the theory of state consentVan-Rooyen, David Patrick2019With the post-WWII acceleration of globalisation and the proliferation of transnational concerns (such as nuclear armament, financial instability, climate change, the spread of diseases etc.), there has been a concomitant increase in international laws and institutions designed to regulate this activity and facilitate international cooperation. This widening and deepening of international law brings to the fore normative concerns about how and from where international law derives its legitimacy. Indeed, international legal institutions have been suffering a 'crisis of legitimacy' in recent years: from the 1999 'Battle of Seattle' to Brexit. This thesis aims to contribute to the philosophical literature on the political legitimacy of international law. In particular, it seeks to morally evaluate the traditional theory of international legal legitimation: 'state consent'. After conducting an in-depth conceptual analysis of three key concepts (international law, political legitimacy, and state consent), the thesis will consider six arguments against the proposition that state consent is either sufficient or necessary for the legitimacy of international law. I conclude that state consent is not 'sufficient' as - to properly legitimate international law - state consent would need to fulfil the additional necessary requirement of being 'authorised' by the individuals within the state; arguably through a process of deliberative democratic decision-making. I also conclude, however, that state consent may be 'necessary' for the legitimacy of a certain category of international law; namely, the international law of 'cooperation' (as opposed to 'coexistence'). The thesis ends by tentatively suggesting proposals for how international law may increase its claim to legitimacy under the existing state-consent model: first, by incentivising a process of internal democratisation, and second, by establishing an international 'harm principle' that better protects third-parties from indirect harm.Durham Universityhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.768376http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12934/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description With the post-WWII acceleration of globalisation and the proliferation of transnational concerns (such as nuclear armament, financial instability, climate change, the spread of diseases etc.), there has been a concomitant increase in international laws and institutions designed to regulate this activity and facilitate international cooperation. This widening and deepening of international law brings to the fore normative concerns about how and from where international law derives its legitimacy. Indeed, international legal institutions have been suffering a 'crisis of legitimacy' in recent years: from the 1999 'Battle of Seattle' to Brexit. This thesis aims to contribute to the philosophical literature on the political legitimacy of international law. In particular, it seeks to morally evaluate the traditional theory of international legal legitimation: 'state consent'. After conducting an in-depth conceptual analysis of three key concepts (international law, political legitimacy, and state consent), the thesis will consider six arguments against the proposition that state consent is either sufficient or necessary for the legitimacy of international law. I conclude that state consent is not 'sufficient' as - to properly legitimate international law - state consent would need to fulfil the additional necessary requirement of being 'authorised' by the individuals within the state; arguably through a process of deliberative democratic decision-making. I also conclude, however, that state consent may be 'necessary' for the legitimacy of a certain category of international law; namely, the international law of 'cooperation' (as opposed to 'coexistence'). The thesis ends by tentatively suggesting proposals for how international law may increase its claim to legitimacy under the existing state-consent model: first, by incentivising a process of internal democratisation, and second, by establishing an international 'harm principle' that better protects third-parties from indirect harm.
author Van-Rooyen, David Patrick
spellingShingle Van-Rooyen, David Patrick
The legitimacy of international law : re-examining the theory of state consent
author_facet Van-Rooyen, David Patrick
author_sort Van-Rooyen, David Patrick
title The legitimacy of international law : re-examining the theory of state consent
title_short The legitimacy of international law : re-examining the theory of state consent
title_full The legitimacy of international law : re-examining the theory of state consent
title_fullStr The legitimacy of international law : re-examining the theory of state consent
title_full_unstemmed The legitimacy of international law : re-examining the theory of state consent
title_sort legitimacy of international law : re-examining the theory of state consent
publisher Durham University
publishDate 2019
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.768376
work_keys_str_mv AT vanrooyendavidpatrick thelegitimacyofinternationallawreexaminingthetheoryofstateconsent
AT vanrooyendavidpatrick legitimacyofinternationallawreexaminingthetheoryofstateconsent
_version_ 1719013164185550848