A commentary on the fragments of fourth-century tragedy

Except for the pseudo-Euripidean Rhesus, fourth-century tragedy has almost entirely been lost to the ravages of time, known only through the quotation of a few isolated lines by later writers or preservation on some sand-worn scraps of papyrus. The poor survival of fourth-century tragedy has inevita...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sims, Thomas
Published: University of Nottingham 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.765522
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-765522
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7655222019-03-05T15:19:01ZA commentary on the fragments of fourth-century tragedySims, Thomas2018Except for the pseudo-Euripidean Rhesus, fourth-century tragedy has almost entirely been lost to the ravages of time, known only through the quotation of a few isolated lines by later writers or preservation on some sand-worn scraps of papyrus. The poor survival of fourth-century tragedy has inevitably led to suggestions of low quality. Recent scholarship, however, has begun to revise these conclusions, recognising a remarkable inventiveness prevalent in the surviving fragments. This thesis aims to continue the rehabilitation of fourth-century tragedy and takes the form of a commentary on the fragments of Astydamas II, Carcinus II, Chaeremon, and Theodectas, the 'leading lights' of this period whose verses comprise over half of what remains. In the introduction, I focus on fourth-century tragedy in general and all its surviving fragments, even those not treated in the commentary. I begin by exploring the internationalisation of this genre and its spread to the Greek-speaking West and East. I then consider the prevalent themes and stylistic features of the fragments and examine fourth-century reaction to fourth-century tragedy, particularly in comedy, oratory, and philosophy. I also discuss fourth-century satyr drama and some of its best surviving examples, including Python's Agen. In the commentary, I provide a biography for each poet and explore their reception and that of their work. I then discuss each of their plays in turn, reconstructing plots where possible and providing information about other treatments of a myth in fifth- and fourth-century drama. Finally, I analyse each fragment, focusing on any textual issues, their literary, stylistic, and dramaturgical qualities, and on their relationship within the dramatic tradition and Greco-Roman literature. Through analysing the fragments in the form of a commentary, I hope to show that far from representing a 'terminal decline' as Edna Hooker once lamented, they instead display many remarkable qualities which make them worthy of study in their own right.PA Classical philologyUniversity of Nottinghamhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.765522http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/55426/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic PA Classical philology
spellingShingle PA Classical philology
Sims, Thomas
A commentary on the fragments of fourth-century tragedy
description Except for the pseudo-Euripidean Rhesus, fourth-century tragedy has almost entirely been lost to the ravages of time, known only through the quotation of a few isolated lines by later writers or preservation on some sand-worn scraps of papyrus. The poor survival of fourth-century tragedy has inevitably led to suggestions of low quality. Recent scholarship, however, has begun to revise these conclusions, recognising a remarkable inventiveness prevalent in the surviving fragments. This thesis aims to continue the rehabilitation of fourth-century tragedy and takes the form of a commentary on the fragments of Astydamas II, Carcinus II, Chaeremon, and Theodectas, the 'leading lights' of this period whose verses comprise over half of what remains. In the introduction, I focus on fourth-century tragedy in general and all its surviving fragments, even those not treated in the commentary. I begin by exploring the internationalisation of this genre and its spread to the Greek-speaking West and East. I then consider the prevalent themes and stylistic features of the fragments and examine fourth-century reaction to fourth-century tragedy, particularly in comedy, oratory, and philosophy. I also discuss fourth-century satyr drama and some of its best surviving examples, including Python's Agen. In the commentary, I provide a biography for each poet and explore their reception and that of their work. I then discuss each of their plays in turn, reconstructing plots where possible and providing information about other treatments of a myth in fifth- and fourth-century drama. Finally, I analyse each fragment, focusing on any textual issues, their literary, stylistic, and dramaturgical qualities, and on their relationship within the dramatic tradition and Greco-Roman literature. Through analysing the fragments in the form of a commentary, I hope to show that far from representing a 'terminal decline' as Edna Hooker once lamented, they instead display many remarkable qualities which make them worthy of study in their own right.
author Sims, Thomas
author_facet Sims, Thomas
author_sort Sims, Thomas
title A commentary on the fragments of fourth-century tragedy
title_short A commentary on the fragments of fourth-century tragedy
title_full A commentary on the fragments of fourth-century tragedy
title_fullStr A commentary on the fragments of fourth-century tragedy
title_full_unstemmed A commentary on the fragments of fourth-century tragedy
title_sort commentary on the fragments of fourth-century tragedy
publisher University of Nottingham
publishDate 2018
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.765522
work_keys_str_mv AT simsthomas acommentaryonthefragmentsoffourthcenturytragedy
AT simsthomas commentaryonthefragmentsoffourthcenturytragedy
_version_ 1718991722973757440