Defending dissent in a time of symbolic power

This study investigates how the ways in which modern digital age, austerity-driven societies are structured can fuel discontent, rising popular support for authoritarian regimes and less tolerance of dissent in a wide range of country contexts. It applies recent theoretical work on social power in i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kilpadi, Pamela
Other Authors: Doogan, Kevin
Published: University of Bristol 2017
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.759964
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-759964
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7599642019-02-05T03:17:31ZDefending dissent in a time of symbolic powerKilpadi, PamelaDoogan, Kevin2017This study investigates how the ways in which modern digital age, austerity-driven societies are structured can fuel discontent, rising popular support for authoritarian regimes and less tolerance of dissent in a wide range of country contexts. It applies recent theoretical work on social power in international relations and the work of Bourdieu and Wacquant on symbolic violence, poverty and social exclusion to the realm of elite geopolitics and (dis)information war. Several case studies are discussed from an ethnographic perspective. Semi-structured interviews are conducted with defenders of dissent and other human rights working in diverse national contexts to better illuminate how political ‘leaders’ create marginal categories of people to silence dissent and consolidate power.University of Bristolhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.759964http://hdl.handle.net/1983/68e452b3-b7ef-4e00-96d7-901d80811280Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description This study investigates how the ways in which modern digital age, austerity-driven societies are structured can fuel discontent, rising popular support for authoritarian regimes and less tolerance of dissent in a wide range of country contexts. It applies recent theoretical work on social power in international relations and the work of Bourdieu and Wacquant on symbolic violence, poverty and social exclusion to the realm of elite geopolitics and (dis)information war. Several case studies are discussed from an ethnographic perspective. Semi-structured interviews are conducted with defenders of dissent and other human rights working in diverse national contexts to better illuminate how political ‘leaders’ create marginal categories of people to silence dissent and consolidate power.
author2 Doogan, Kevin
author_facet Doogan, Kevin
Kilpadi, Pamela
author Kilpadi, Pamela
spellingShingle Kilpadi, Pamela
Defending dissent in a time of symbolic power
author_sort Kilpadi, Pamela
title Defending dissent in a time of symbolic power
title_short Defending dissent in a time of symbolic power
title_full Defending dissent in a time of symbolic power
title_fullStr Defending dissent in a time of symbolic power
title_full_unstemmed Defending dissent in a time of symbolic power
title_sort defending dissent in a time of symbolic power
publisher University of Bristol
publishDate 2017
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.759964
work_keys_str_mv AT kilpadipamela defendingdissentinatimeofsymbolicpower
_version_ 1718972729651101696