A study of Muslim polemics directed against Jews

A survey of the anti-Jewish literature of Islam shows that whilst parts of the Koran are violently anti-Jewish, later Islam tends to ignore the Jews, and when it treats of them, appears to draw considerably on Christian sources. In this connection, the authenticity of Ali fabari's work can be e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perlmann, Moshe
Published: SOAS, University of London 1940
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.759136
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-759136
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7591362018-12-11T03:19:12ZA study of Muslim polemics directed against JewsPerlmann, Moshe1940A survey of the anti-Jewish literature of Islam shows that whilst parts of the Koran are violently anti-Jewish, later Islam tends to ignore the Jews, and when it treats of them, appears to draw considerably on Christian sources. In this connection, the authenticity of Ali fabari's work can be established. An outstanding polemist was Ibn Hazm, but his contention that the Bible is a forgery is quoted in detail in works of a century before, as the opinion of still earlier Mu'tazilis. Samau'al al-Maghribi, a convert from Judaism, a century later, marks a further stage in the polemic. The later writers who quarried from his works are discussed, and the connection between them made clear. In particular, the connections between his tract and Ibn Kammuna's work are traced. Abrogation of one revelation by a later is the pivot of this controversy, and had a large share in developing the Muslim theory. The charge of anthropomorphism was brought against the Jews, and particular emphasis laid on their inferiority.SOAS, University of Londonhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.759136http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/29128/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description A survey of the anti-Jewish literature of Islam shows that whilst parts of the Koran are violently anti-Jewish, later Islam tends to ignore the Jews, and when it treats of them, appears to draw considerably on Christian sources. In this connection, the authenticity of Ali fabari's work can be established. An outstanding polemist was Ibn Hazm, but his contention that the Bible is a forgery is quoted in detail in works of a century before, as the opinion of still earlier Mu'tazilis. Samau'al al-Maghribi, a convert from Judaism, a century later, marks a further stage in the polemic. The later writers who quarried from his works are discussed, and the connection between them made clear. In particular, the connections between his tract and Ibn Kammuna's work are traced. Abrogation of one revelation by a later is the pivot of this controversy, and had a large share in developing the Muslim theory. The charge of anthropomorphism was brought against the Jews, and particular emphasis laid on their inferiority.
author Perlmann, Moshe
spellingShingle Perlmann, Moshe
A study of Muslim polemics directed against Jews
author_facet Perlmann, Moshe
author_sort Perlmann, Moshe
title A study of Muslim polemics directed against Jews
title_short A study of Muslim polemics directed against Jews
title_full A study of Muslim polemics directed against Jews
title_fullStr A study of Muslim polemics directed against Jews
title_full_unstemmed A study of Muslim polemics directed against Jews
title_sort study of muslim polemics directed against jews
publisher SOAS, University of London
publishDate 1940
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.759136
work_keys_str_mv AT perlmannmoshe astudyofmuslimpolemicsdirectedagainstjews
AT perlmannmoshe studyofmuslimpolemicsdirectedagainstjews
_version_ 1718800615942914048