Quantifying texture scale in accordance with human perception

Visual texture has multiple perceptual attributes (e.g. regularity, isotropy, etc.), including scale. The scale of visual texture has been defined as the size of the repeating unit (or texel) of which the texture is composed. Not all textures are formed through the placement of a clearly discernible...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bouremoum, Sami
Published: University College London (University of London) 2018
Subjects:
004
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.756237
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-756237
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7562372019-03-05T15:16:57ZQuantifying texture scale in accordance with human perceptionBouremoum, Sami2018Visual texture has multiple perceptual attributes (e.g. regularity, isotropy, etc.), including scale. The scale of visual texture has been defined as the size of the repeating unit (or texel) of which the texture is composed. Not all textures are formed through the placement of a clearly discernible repeating unit (e.g. irregular and stochastic textures). There is currently no rigorous definition for texture scale that is applicable to textures of a wide range of regularities. We hypothesised that texture scale ought to extend to these less regular textures. Non-overlapping sample windows (or patches) taken from a texture appear increasingly similar as the size of the window gets larger. This is true irrespective of whether the texture is formed by the placement of a discernible repeating unit or not. We propose the following new characterisation for texture scale: “the smallest window size beyond within which texture appears consistently”. We perform two psychophysical studies and report data that demonstrates consensus across subjects and across methods of probing in the assessment of texture scale. We then present an empirical algorithm for the estimation of scale based on this characterisation. We demonstrate agreement between the algorithm and (subjective) human assessment with an RMS accuracy of 1.2 just-noticeable-differences, a significant improvement over previous published algorithms. We provide two ground-truth perceptual datasets, one for each of our psychophysical studies, for the texture scale of the entire Brodatz album, together with confidence levels for each of our estimates. Finally, we make available an online tool which researchers can use to obtain texture scale estimates by uploading images of textures.004University College London (University of London)https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.756237http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10054221/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 004
spellingShingle 004
Bouremoum, Sami
Quantifying texture scale in accordance with human perception
description Visual texture has multiple perceptual attributes (e.g. regularity, isotropy, etc.), including scale. The scale of visual texture has been defined as the size of the repeating unit (or texel) of which the texture is composed. Not all textures are formed through the placement of a clearly discernible repeating unit (e.g. irregular and stochastic textures). There is currently no rigorous definition for texture scale that is applicable to textures of a wide range of regularities. We hypothesised that texture scale ought to extend to these less regular textures. Non-overlapping sample windows (or patches) taken from a texture appear increasingly similar as the size of the window gets larger. This is true irrespective of whether the texture is formed by the placement of a discernible repeating unit or not. We propose the following new characterisation for texture scale: “the smallest window size beyond within which texture appears consistently”. We perform two psychophysical studies and report data that demonstrates consensus across subjects and across methods of probing in the assessment of texture scale. We then present an empirical algorithm for the estimation of scale based on this characterisation. We demonstrate agreement between the algorithm and (subjective) human assessment with an RMS accuracy of 1.2 just-noticeable-differences, a significant improvement over previous published algorithms. We provide two ground-truth perceptual datasets, one for each of our psychophysical studies, for the texture scale of the entire Brodatz album, together with confidence levels for each of our estimates. Finally, we make available an online tool which researchers can use to obtain texture scale estimates by uploading images of textures.
author Bouremoum, Sami
author_facet Bouremoum, Sami
author_sort Bouremoum, Sami
title Quantifying texture scale in accordance with human perception
title_short Quantifying texture scale in accordance with human perception
title_full Quantifying texture scale in accordance with human perception
title_fullStr Quantifying texture scale in accordance with human perception
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying texture scale in accordance with human perception
title_sort quantifying texture scale in accordance with human perception
publisher University College London (University of London)
publishDate 2018
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.756237
work_keys_str_mv AT bouremoumsami quantifyingtexturescaleinaccordancewithhumanperception
_version_ 1718991305815621632