Chinese views of the role of morality in international relations and the use of force

This study quantitatively tested whether the strategic preferences of China’s future decision makers are consistent with non-coercive Confucian values. Students at six elite Chinese universities were surveyed to identify beliefs about the character of the international system, when and how it is per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Filler, Lukas
Other Authors: Patalano, Alessio ; Yang, Suzanne Xiao ; Lin, Kun-Chin
Published: King's College London (University of London) 2018
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.754921
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-754921
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7549212019-02-05T03:27:08ZChinese views of the role of morality in international relations and the use of forceFiller, LukasPatalano, Alessio ; Yang, Suzanne Xiao ; Lin, Kun-Chin2018This study quantitatively tested whether the strategic preferences of China’s future decision makers are consistent with non-coercive Confucian values. Students at six elite Chinese universities were surveyed to identify beliefs about the character of the international system, when and how it is permissible to use force, and whether morality should constrain state behavior. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to characterize and validate stated beliefs, strategic preferences, and moral reasoning as well as to determine the extent to which they reflected the theoretical Confucian system of values and conception of moral governance. Respondents’ perception of a dangerous, zero-sum, conflict-prone international system was not consistent with a Confucian worldview. Neither was their strong proclivity to use force to counter most any potential threat or when in the state’s best overall interests. There was substantial concern for noncombatants and the intentionality of harming them influenced the morality of doing so. However, moral ideals did not strongly constrain behavior. At the same time, such exceptional necessity also did not tend to make immoral behavior moral. There was also a consistent, strong bias to hold foreign states to higher standards of behavior and morality than the respondents’ own state. The results also showed that the framework of related issues which define and differentiate major IR theories only explained a small portion of respondents’ beliefs about the international system, state behavior, and the role of morality in them. It is likely that respondents’ reasoning about these issues were also influenced by nationalistic beliefs which combined Confucian and political realist ideologies.King's College London (University of London)https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.754921https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/chinese-views-of-the-role-of-morality-in-international-relations-and-the-use-of-force(a77e8a31-990d-4e65-ab62-09232acc66d5).htmlElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description This study quantitatively tested whether the strategic preferences of China’s future decision makers are consistent with non-coercive Confucian values. Students at six elite Chinese universities were surveyed to identify beliefs about the character of the international system, when and how it is permissible to use force, and whether morality should constrain state behavior. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to characterize and validate stated beliefs, strategic preferences, and moral reasoning as well as to determine the extent to which they reflected the theoretical Confucian system of values and conception of moral governance. Respondents’ perception of a dangerous, zero-sum, conflict-prone international system was not consistent with a Confucian worldview. Neither was their strong proclivity to use force to counter most any potential threat or when in the state’s best overall interests. There was substantial concern for noncombatants and the intentionality of harming them influenced the morality of doing so. However, moral ideals did not strongly constrain behavior. At the same time, such exceptional necessity also did not tend to make immoral behavior moral. There was also a consistent, strong bias to hold foreign states to higher standards of behavior and morality than the respondents’ own state. The results also showed that the framework of related issues which define and differentiate major IR theories only explained a small portion of respondents’ beliefs about the international system, state behavior, and the role of morality in them. It is likely that respondents’ reasoning about these issues were also influenced by nationalistic beliefs which combined Confucian and political realist ideologies.
author2 Patalano, Alessio ; Yang, Suzanne Xiao ; Lin, Kun-Chin
author_facet Patalano, Alessio ; Yang, Suzanne Xiao ; Lin, Kun-Chin
Filler, Lukas
author Filler, Lukas
spellingShingle Filler, Lukas
Chinese views of the role of morality in international relations and the use of force
author_sort Filler, Lukas
title Chinese views of the role of morality in international relations and the use of force
title_short Chinese views of the role of morality in international relations and the use of force
title_full Chinese views of the role of morality in international relations and the use of force
title_fullStr Chinese views of the role of morality in international relations and the use of force
title_full_unstemmed Chinese views of the role of morality in international relations and the use of force
title_sort chinese views of the role of morality in international relations and the use of force
publisher King's College London (University of London)
publishDate 2018
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.754921
work_keys_str_mv AT fillerlukas chineseviewsoftheroleofmoralityininternationalrelationsandtheuseofforce
_version_ 1718973291105878016