Developing peptide vaccines for breast cancer

The complex and heterogeneous nature of breast cancer presents significant challenges for many conventional cancer therapies. Immunotherapy has the potential to provide a more potent, less invasive and less toxic approach to breast cancer treatment, with several successes already evident in the trea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Theaker, Sarah M.
Published: Cardiff University 2018
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.753573
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-753573
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7535732019-02-05T03:34:33ZDeveloping peptide vaccines for breast cancerTheaker, Sarah M.2018The complex and heterogeneous nature of breast cancer presents significant challenges for many conventional cancer therapies. Immunotherapy has the potential to provide a more potent, less invasive and less toxic approach to breast cancer treatment, with several successes already evident in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Three recently described tumour-associated antigens (TAAs); (1) NY-BR-1, (2) cadherin-3/P-cadherin (CDH3), and (3) bone marrow stromal cell antigen-2 (BST-2), have been implicated as candidates for breast cancer vaccination strategies. However, peptide vaccines that are designed using wild-type (WT) sequences of these proteins are likely to elicit suboptimal T-cell responses in patients. This is generally attributable to the low affinity of thymically-selected Tcell receptors (TCRs) for “self” TAAs. Here I describe a method for enhancing the immunogenicity of these three HLA-A*0201 (HLA-A2)-restricted breast cancer epitopes. Firstly, αβ CD8+ T-cell clones were generated against each of the epitopes using three different approaches; (i) T-cell lines and (ii) T-cell libraries (Chapter 3),and (iii) tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (Chapter 4), and the breast cancer reactivity of these clones confirmed in vitro. Then, using a positional scanning synthetic combinatorial library (PS-SCL), altered peptide ligands (APLs) were designed for each of the clones (Chapter 5). These APLs were shown to be up to 100,000-fold more potent than the respective WT epitopes. Preliminary “proof-ofconcept” CD8+ T-cell priming experiments on healthy HLA-A2+ donors were then used to establish whether a chosen BST-2 APL was capable of activating superior breast cancer specific T-cell populations in vitro (Chapter 6). From these preliminary investigations, it was found that the BST-2 APL was capable of generating a T-cell response of greater magnitude, and that was also better able to kill breast cancer cells when compared to the corresponding BST-2 WT peptide. Together, these experiments illustrate the potential use of APLs for the development of a highly effective prophylactic or therapeutic peptide vaccine for breast cancer.Cardiff Universityhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.753573http://orca.cf.ac.uk/113785/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description The complex and heterogeneous nature of breast cancer presents significant challenges for many conventional cancer therapies. Immunotherapy has the potential to provide a more potent, less invasive and less toxic approach to breast cancer treatment, with several successes already evident in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Three recently described tumour-associated antigens (TAAs); (1) NY-BR-1, (2) cadherin-3/P-cadherin (CDH3), and (3) bone marrow stromal cell antigen-2 (BST-2), have been implicated as candidates for breast cancer vaccination strategies. However, peptide vaccines that are designed using wild-type (WT) sequences of these proteins are likely to elicit suboptimal T-cell responses in patients. This is generally attributable to the low affinity of thymically-selected Tcell receptors (TCRs) for “self” TAAs. Here I describe a method for enhancing the immunogenicity of these three HLA-A*0201 (HLA-A2)-restricted breast cancer epitopes. Firstly, αβ CD8+ T-cell clones were generated against each of the epitopes using three different approaches; (i) T-cell lines and (ii) T-cell libraries (Chapter 3),and (iii) tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (Chapter 4), and the breast cancer reactivity of these clones confirmed in vitro. Then, using a positional scanning synthetic combinatorial library (PS-SCL), altered peptide ligands (APLs) were designed for each of the clones (Chapter 5). These APLs were shown to be up to 100,000-fold more potent than the respective WT epitopes. Preliminary “proof-ofconcept” CD8+ T-cell priming experiments on healthy HLA-A2+ donors were then used to establish whether a chosen BST-2 APL was capable of activating superior breast cancer specific T-cell populations in vitro (Chapter 6). From these preliminary investigations, it was found that the BST-2 APL was capable of generating a T-cell response of greater magnitude, and that was also better able to kill breast cancer cells when compared to the corresponding BST-2 WT peptide. Together, these experiments illustrate the potential use of APLs for the development of a highly effective prophylactic or therapeutic peptide vaccine for breast cancer.
author Theaker, Sarah M.
spellingShingle Theaker, Sarah M.
Developing peptide vaccines for breast cancer
author_facet Theaker, Sarah M.
author_sort Theaker, Sarah M.
title Developing peptide vaccines for breast cancer
title_short Developing peptide vaccines for breast cancer
title_full Developing peptide vaccines for breast cancer
title_fullStr Developing peptide vaccines for breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Developing peptide vaccines for breast cancer
title_sort developing peptide vaccines for breast cancer
publisher Cardiff University
publishDate 2018
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.753573
work_keys_str_mv AT theakersarahm developingpeptidevaccinesforbreastcancer
_version_ 1718974145704755200