Intuition and reason : decision making in compositional processes

My aims for this PhD are to define intuitive and reasoned decision making in my own compositional processes and to present a portfolio of six original compositions. I will present an analysis of my own conscious, increasingly intuitive compositional decisions, through a portfolio of six compositions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carey, Neil J.
Other Authors: Armstrong, Thomas
Published: University of Surrey 2018
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.751838
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-751838
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7518382019-02-05T03:27:06ZIntuition and reason : decision making in compositional processesCarey, Neil J.Armstrong, Thomas2018My aims for this PhD are to define intuitive and reasoned decision making in my own compositional processes and to present a portfolio of six original compositions. I will present an analysis of my own conscious, increasingly intuitive compositional decisions, through a portfolio of six compositions and an accompanying technical commentary. I investigate Thomas Kuhn’s work on revolutions in science through his landmark book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. This leads to work developed from Kuhn’s theories by Miranda Fricker, which allows me to develop a definition of intuitive decision making in compositional processes. I use this definition, applied to my own compositional decision-making in the creation of the six pieces in my portfolio, to chart my own increasingly intuitive approach to the compositional process. Aspects of my own music become more intuitive over time. The first piece composed, October 2010 for piano trio, is reasoned in the application of certain elements such as pitch and rhythm organisation, from the pre-compositional processes to the final outcome. The final piece in my portfolio, a chamber opera, is significantly different as much of the compositional processes are consciously intuitive. This evolution of my compositional decision-making is charted through all six compositions in the accompanying technical commentary. I contribute to knowledge in the area of meta-cognitive thinking in relation to compositional decision-making. My six compositions contribute to the repertoire of contemporary art music.University of Surreyhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.751838http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/848641/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description My aims for this PhD are to define intuitive and reasoned decision making in my own compositional processes and to present a portfolio of six original compositions. I will present an analysis of my own conscious, increasingly intuitive compositional decisions, through a portfolio of six compositions and an accompanying technical commentary. I investigate Thomas Kuhn’s work on revolutions in science through his landmark book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. This leads to work developed from Kuhn’s theories by Miranda Fricker, which allows me to develop a definition of intuitive decision making in compositional processes. I use this definition, applied to my own compositional decision-making in the creation of the six pieces in my portfolio, to chart my own increasingly intuitive approach to the compositional process. Aspects of my own music become more intuitive over time. The first piece composed, October 2010 for piano trio, is reasoned in the application of certain elements such as pitch and rhythm organisation, from the pre-compositional processes to the final outcome. The final piece in my portfolio, a chamber opera, is significantly different as much of the compositional processes are consciously intuitive. This evolution of my compositional decision-making is charted through all six compositions in the accompanying technical commentary. I contribute to knowledge in the area of meta-cognitive thinking in relation to compositional decision-making. My six compositions contribute to the repertoire of contemporary art music.
author2 Armstrong, Thomas
author_facet Armstrong, Thomas
Carey, Neil J.
author Carey, Neil J.
spellingShingle Carey, Neil J.
Intuition and reason : decision making in compositional processes
author_sort Carey, Neil J.
title Intuition and reason : decision making in compositional processes
title_short Intuition and reason : decision making in compositional processes
title_full Intuition and reason : decision making in compositional processes
title_fullStr Intuition and reason : decision making in compositional processes
title_full_unstemmed Intuition and reason : decision making in compositional processes
title_sort intuition and reason : decision making in compositional processes
publisher University of Surrey
publishDate 2018
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.751838
work_keys_str_mv AT careyneilj intuitionandreasondecisionmakingincompositionalprocesses
_version_ 1718973170436800512