The electrical resistivity of dislocations in aluminium

Aluminium foil was extended by tensile deformation at room temperature by amounts up to about 15% plastic strain. The flow stress (alpha) the change in electrical resistivity (Deltarho) and the dislocation density (N[1]) were measured as a function of plastic strain and subsequent annealing. The cha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Foxon, Charles Thomas Bayley
Published: University of Surrey 1965
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.751633
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-751633
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7516332018-10-09T03:27:05ZThe electrical resistivity of dislocations in aluminiumFoxon, Charles Thomas Bayley1965Aluminium foil was extended by tensile deformation at room temperature by amounts up to about 15% plastic strain. The flow stress (alpha) the change in electrical resistivity (Deltarho) and the dislocation density (N[1]) were measured as a function of plastic strain and subsequent annealing. The change in electrical resistivity was measured at liquid Helium temperature and the dislocation density was measured by thin film transmission electron microscopy. The change in electrical resistivity and the dislocation density were both proportional to the plastic strain and hence to one another. The annealing of the extended specimens was found to occur in three stages. The first, which occurred at room temperature was due to the annealing out of point defects; an activation energy of 0.65eV was obtained for this process. The second stage took place above about 70°C and during this process both a re-arrangement and loss of dislocations occurred. The third stage was recrystallisation. The resistivity of dislocations in the deformed state was found to be: Deltarho = (18 +/- 1) X 10[-20] N[1] ohm cm. and after the second annealing stage: Deltarho = (17 +/- 2) X 10[-20] N[1] ohm cm. These results have been compared with experimental values obtained by other authors and with various theoretical estimates. It is suggested, that the loss of dislocations during the preparation of thin foils was negligible, that the scattering of conduction electrons by the core of a dislocation compared with that of the long range strain field was not negligible in contributing to the electrical resistivity and that the theoretically calculated value of the stored energy of a dislocation in Aluminium[38] was correct within +/- 25%.University of Surreyhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.751633http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/848216/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Aluminium foil was extended by tensile deformation at room temperature by amounts up to about 15% plastic strain. The flow stress (alpha) the change in electrical resistivity (Deltarho) and the dislocation density (N[1]) were measured as a function of plastic strain and subsequent annealing. The change in electrical resistivity was measured at liquid Helium temperature and the dislocation density was measured by thin film transmission electron microscopy. The change in electrical resistivity and the dislocation density were both proportional to the plastic strain and hence to one another. The annealing of the extended specimens was found to occur in three stages. The first, which occurred at room temperature was due to the annealing out of point defects; an activation energy of 0.65eV was obtained for this process. The second stage took place above about 70°C and during this process both a re-arrangement and loss of dislocations occurred. The third stage was recrystallisation. The resistivity of dislocations in the deformed state was found to be: Deltarho = (18 +/- 1) X 10[-20] N[1] ohm cm. and after the second annealing stage: Deltarho = (17 +/- 2) X 10[-20] N[1] ohm cm. These results have been compared with experimental values obtained by other authors and with various theoretical estimates. It is suggested, that the loss of dislocations during the preparation of thin foils was negligible, that the scattering of conduction electrons by the core of a dislocation compared with that of the long range strain field was not negligible in contributing to the electrical resistivity and that the theoretically calculated value of the stored energy of a dislocation in Aluminium[38] was correct within +/- 25%.
author Foxon, Charles Thomas Bayley
spellingShingle Foxon, Charles Thomas Bayley
The electrical resistivity of dislocations in aluminium
author_facet Foxon, Charles Thomas Bayley
author_sort Foxon, Charles Thomas Bayley
title The electrical resistivity of dislocations in aluminium
title_short The electrical resistivity of dislocations in aluminium
title_full The electrical resistivity of dislocations in aluminium
title_fullStr The electrical resistivity of dislocations in aluminium
title_full_unstemmed The electrical resistivity of dislocations in aluminium
title_sort electrical resistivity of dislocations in aluminium
publisher University of Surrey
publishDate 1965
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.751633
work_keys_str_mv AT foxoncharlesthomasbayley theelectricalresistivityofdislocationsinaluminium
AT foxoncharlesthomasbayley electricalresistivityofdislocationsinaluminium
_version_ 1718772602021871616