The All In Award : a feasibility study of an intervention to improve children's attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities

AIMS: This review examined psycho- and sociometric methods used to assess children’s attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities, along with the quality of the measurement methods used. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out to identify studies investigating attitudes of typically d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fitzgerald, Sophie
Other Authors: Scior, K.
Published: University College London (University of London) 2017
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.746892
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-746892
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7468922019-01-08T03:19:35ZThe All In Award : a feasibility study of an intervention to improve children's attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilitiesFitzgerald, SophieScior, K.2017AIMS: This review examined psycho- and sociometric methods used to assess children’s attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities, along with the quality of the measurement methods used. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out to identify studies investigating attitudes of typically developing children towards their peers with intellectual disabilities, published between 2000 and 2016. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were examined for the measurement method used and its quality. RESULTS: The review identified 27 articles which met the inclusion criteria. Across the studies reported, 20 different questionnaires were used. A number of studies combined measurement methods to assess the cognitive, affective and behavioural components of attitudes. Seven studies used sociometric methods alone. The articles provided very little information on the reliability and validity of the measures they used. CONCLUSIONS: Most measures in use were designed to assess attitudes towards peers with disability in general, rather than specifically towards those with intellectual disabilities. Outdated and controversial language is used in some measures. There is limited information available on the reliability and validity of the available measures, suggesting a need for future research to carefully examine and report on the psychometric properties of measures when assessing attitudes in this field.University College London (University of London)https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.746892http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10022814/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description AIMS: This review examined psycho- and sociometric methods used to assess children’s attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities, along with the quality of the measurement methods used. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out to identify studies investigating attitudes of typically developing children towards their peers with intellectual disabilities, published between 2000 and 2016. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were examined for the measurement method used and its quality. RESULTS: The review identified 27 articles which met the inclusion criteria. Across the studies reported, 20 different questionnaires were used. A number of studies combined measurement methods to assess the cognitive, affective and behavioural components of attitudes. Seven studies used sociometric methods alone. The articles provided very little information on the reliability and validity of the measures they used. CONCLUSIONS: Most measures in use were designed to assess attitudes towards peers with disability in general, rather than specifically towards those with intellectual disabilities. Outdated and controversial language is used in some measures. There is limited information available on the reliability and validity of the available measures, suggesting a need for future research to carefully examine and report on the psychometric properties of measures when assessing attitudes in this field.
author2 Scior, K.
author_facet Scior, K.
Fitzgerald, Sophie
author Fitzgerald, Sophie
spellingShingle Fitzgerald, Sophie
The All In Award : a feasibility study of an intervention to improve children's attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities
author_sort Fitzgerald, Sophie
title The All In Award : a feasibility study of an intervention to improve children's attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities
title_short The All In Award : a feasibility study of an intervention to improve children's attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities
title_full The All In Award : a feasibility study of an intervention to improve children's attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities
title_fullStr The All In Award : a feasibility study of an intervention to improve children's attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities
title_full_unstemmed The All In Award : a feasibility study of an intervention to improve children's attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities
title_sort all in award : a feasibility study of an intervention to improve children's attitudes towards peers with intellectual disabilities
publisher University College London (University of London)
publishDate 2017
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.746892
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzgeraldsophie theallinawardafeasibilitystudyofaninterventiontoimprovechildrensattitudestowardspeerswithintellectualdisabilities
AT fitzgeraldsophie allinawardafeasibilitystudyofaninterventiontoimprovechildrensattitudestowardspeerswithintellectualdisabilities
_version_ 1718807268376444928