Support following miscarriage

One in four pregnancies ends in miscarriage; it is the most common type of pregnancy loss. It can be a devastating and traumatic experience, yet often it goes unrecognised and unspoken about. This thesis, presented in three parts, looks at formal and informal sources of support for women in the afte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elfer, A. F.
Other Authors: Pistrang, N. ; Barker, C.
Published: University College London (University of London) 2017
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.746855
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-746855
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7468552019-01-08T03:20:31ZSupport following miscarriageElfer, A. F.Pistrang, N. ; Barker, C.2017One in four pregnancies ends in miscarriage; it is the most common type of pregnancy loss. It can be a devastating and traumatic experience, yet often it goes unrecognised and unspoken about. This thesis, presented in three parts, looks at formal and informal sources of support for women in the aftermath of miscarriage. Part I is a literature review of the effectiveness of psychological interventions for women following miscarriage. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions evaluated included CBT, IPT, nurse/midwife led sessions, and psychological debriefing. Nine of the studies found improvement in symptoms following intervention. There was no evidence of differential effectiveness for interventions of different theoretical underpinnings. Part II presents the findings of a qualitative study of women’s experiences of social support following miscarriage. Thirteen women took part in semi-structured interviews which were analysed using Braun and Clark’s (2006) method of thematic analysis, yielding 10 themes. Women encountered a number of barriers to talking about miscarriage e.g. its physical nature and being surrounded by other pregnant women. They experienced both unsupportive interactions (e.g. dismissive remarks, encouragement to move on) and supportive interactions (e.g. validation and permission to talk). The findings are discussed with reference to the literature on grief, trauma and social support. Part III is a critical appraisal of the process of conducting the research presented in Part II. It focuses on three main areas: personal reflexivity; epistemological reflexivity; and broader reflections on miscarriage as a taboo subject.University College London (University of London)https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.746855http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1575469/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description One in four pregnancies ends in miscarriage; it is the most common type of pregnancy loss. It can be a devastating and traumatic experience, yet often it goes unrecognised and unspoken about. This thesis, presented in three parts, looks at formal and informal sources of support for women in the aftermath of miscarriage. Part I is a literature review of the effectiveness of psychological interventions for women following miscarriage. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions evaluated included CBT, IPT, nurse/midwife led sessions, and psychological debriefing. Nine of the studies found improvement in symptoms following intervention. There was no evidence of differential effectiveness for interventions of different theoretical underpinnings. Part II presents the findings of a qualitative study of women’s experiences of social support following miscarriage. Thirteen women took part in semi-structured interviews which were analysed using Braun and Clark’s (2006) method of thematic analysis, yielding 10 themes. Women encountered a number of barriers to talking about miscarriage e.g. its physical nature and being surrounded by other pregnant women. They experienced both unsupportive interactions (e.g. dismissive remarks, encouragement to move on) and supportive interactions (e.g. validation and permission to talk). The findings are discussed with reference to the literature on grief, trauma and social support. Part III is a critical appraisal of the process of conducting the research presented in Part II. It focuses on three main areas: personal reflexivity; epistemological reflexivity; and broader reflections on miscarriage as a taboo subject.
author2 Pistrang, N. ; Barker, C.
author_facet Pistrang, N. ; Barker, C.
Elfer, A. F.
author Elfer, A. F.
spellingShingle Elfer, A. F.
Support following miscarriage
author_sort Elfer, A. F.
title Support following miscarriage
title_short Support following miscarriage
title_full Support following miscarriage
title_fullStr Support following miscarriage
title_full_unstemmed Support following miscarriage
title_sort support following miscarriage
publisher University College London (University of London)
publishDate 2017
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.746855
work_keys_str_mv AT elferaf supportfollowingmiscarriage
_version_ 1718807264072040448