American Chinese medicine

This thesis explores the power structures which shape Chinese medicine in the United States. Chinese medicine had two incarnations: migrant Chinese practice and its professionalized form. From the 1880s to the 1940s, Chinese medicine was practiced by the Chinese diaspora to serve their communities a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Phan, Tyler
Other Authors: Calabrese, J. ; Lo, V.
Published: University College London (University of London) 2017
Subjects:
301
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.746764
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-746764
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7467642019-03-05T15:18:02ZAmerican Chinese medicinePhan, TylerCalabrese, J. ; Lo, V.2017This thesis explores the power structures which shape Chinese medicine in the United States. Chinese medicine had two incarnations: migrant Chinese practice and its professionalized form. From the 1880s to the 1940s, Chinese medicine was practiced by the Chinese diaspora to serve their communities and non-Chinese settler populations. From the 1970s onward, Chinese medicine professionalized under the agency of acupuncture. Through the regulation of acupuncture, groups of predominately white Americans began to create standards of practice based on the enactment of what I have referred to as “orientalized biopower.” Orientalized biopower is the process where America’s predominately white counterculture began to encompass an orientalism which romanticized a form of Chinese medicine constructed in the 1950s by the People’s Republic of China called Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). With the adoption of TCM in the United States, they also formulated measures which marginalized Asian Americans practitioners. The profession then labelled itself as “Oriental Medicine” embodying Edward Said’s concept of Orientalism. Along with this form of orientalism, the counterculture used the State to push for a standardized epistemology of TCM. In return, the State encompassed standardized Chinese medicine as element of biopower. My research is informed by a cross-country ethnography of schools, regulatory bodies, and private practices around North America. Through my investigation, I discover the power structures of Chinese medicine, contained within the regulatory bodies and schools, are mostly dominated by white Americans. Combined, they construct a profession and determine the “legitimate” and “illegitimate” forms of Chinese medicine, which constitutes the criteria for who can and cannot practice legally in the country.301University College London (University of London)https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.746764http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1571107/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 301
spellingShingle 301
Phan, Tyler
American Chinese medicine
description This thesis explores the power structures which shape Chinese medicine in the United States. Chinese medicine had two incarnations: migrant Chinese practice and its professionalized form. From the 1880s to the 1940s, Chinese medicine was practiced by the Chinese diaspora to serve their communities and non-Chinese settler populations. From the 1970s onward, Chinese medicine professionalized under the agency of acupuncture. Through the regulation of acupuncture, groups of predominately white Americans began to create standards of practice based on the enactment of what I have referred to as “orientalized biopower.” Orientalized biopower is the process where America’s predominately white counterculture began to encompass an orientalism which romanticized a form of Chinese medicine constructed in the 1950s by the People’s Republic of China called Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). With the adoption of TCM in the United States, they also formulated measures which marginalized Asian Americans practitioners. The profession then labelled itself as “Oriental Medicine” embodying Edward Said’s concept of Orientalism. Along with this form of orientalism, the counterculture used the State to push for a standardized epistemology of TCM. In return, the State encompassed standardized Chinese medicine as element of biopower. My research is informed by a cross-country ethnography of schools, regulatory bodies, and private practices around North America. Through my investigation, I discover the power structures of Chinese medicine, contained within the regulatory bodies and schools, are mostly dominated by white Americans. Combined, they construct a profession and determine the “legitimate” and “illegitimate” forms of Chinese medicine, which constitutes the criteria for who can and cannot practice legally in the country.
author2 Calabrese, J. ; Lo, V.
author_facet Calabrese, J. ; Lo, V.
Phan, Tyler
author Phan, Tyler
author_sort Phan, Tyler
title American Chinese medicine
title_short American Chinese medicine
title_full American Chinese medicine
title_fullStr American Chinese medicine
title_full_unstemmed American Chinese medicine
title_sort american chinese medicine
publisher University College London (University of London)
publishDate 2017
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.746764
work_keys_str_mv AT phantyler americanchinesemedicine
_version_ 1718991585968914432