Veiled pearls : women in Saudi Arabia in contemporary fiction

In comparison to other Arab/Muslim women, Saudi women are underexamined and/or often misrepresented. This thesis resists Saudi women’s obscurity and sheds light on their struggle to overcome domination and achieve emancipation. It analyses Hilary Mantel’s Eight Months on Ghazzah Street (1988), Rajaa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Al-Harby, Nesreen Abdullah
Other Authors: Parker, Emma
Published: University of Leicester 2018
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.745864
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-745864
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7458642019-01-08T03:37:54ZVeiled pearls : women in Saudi Arabia in contemporary fictionAl-Harby, Nesreen AbdullahParker, Emma2018In comparison to other Arab/Muslim women, Saudi women are underexamined and/or often misrepresented. This thesis resists Saudi women’s obscurity and sheds light on their struggle to overcome domination and achieve emancipation. It analyses Hilary Mantel’s Eight Months on Ghazzah Street (1988), Rajaa Alsanea’s Girls of Riyadh (2008), Zoe Ferraris’s trilogy, Finding Nouf (2009), City of Veils (2011), and Kingdom of Strangers (2012), and Alys Einion’s Inshallah (2014). The thesis examines the significance of pre- and post-9/11 political and social contexts of representations of women in Saudi Arabia, compares depictions of Western (English, Welsh, and American) and Saudi women, and scrutinizes the effect of genre (the Gothic, the thriller, detective fiction and Chick Lit) on representations of women in a Saudi context. It draws on Arab/Muslim feminism to assess the degree to which the novels reproduce or challenge prevailing discourses of gender and Orientalism. This thesis argues that, through their employment of genre, the writers examined highlight women’s injustices. It contends that, although the novels analysed indicate that white women are not less oppressed than Saudi women, they provide an Orientalist representation of Saudi Arabia as a fearful space. Finally, this thesis demonstrates that Alsanea is the only writer that provides Saudi self-representation. However, she falls into self-Orientalism by restricting her depiction of Saudi women to the social elite. This thesis sheds light on Western representations of women in Saudi Arabia, broadens the very limited number of feminist studies of Saudi women, paves the road for more studies of gender in Saudi Arabia and provides much-needed material for international scholars interested in investigating the lives of women in Saudi Arabia.University of Leicesterhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.745864http://hdl.handle.net/2381/42480Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description In comparison to other Arab/Muslim women, Saudi women are underexamined and/or often misrepresented. This thesis resists Saudi women’s obscurity and sheds light on their struggle to overcome domination and achieve emancipation. It analyses Hilary Mantel’s Eight Months on Ghazzah Street (1988), Rajaa Alsanea’s Girls of Riyadh (2008), Zoe Ferraris’s trilogy, Finding Nouf (2009), City of Veils (2011), and Kingdom of Strangers (2012), and Alys Einion’s Inshallah (2014). The thesis examines the significance of pre- and post-9/11 political and social contexts of representations of women in Saudi Arabia, compares depictions of Western (English, Welsh, and American) and Saudi women, and scrutinizes the effect of genre (the Gothic, the thriller, detective fiction and Chick Lit) on representations of women in a Saudi context. It draws on Arab/Muslim feminism to assess the degree to which the novels reproduce or challenge prevailing discourses of gender and Orientalism. This thesis argues that, through their employment of genre, the writers examined highlight women’s injustices. It contends that, although the novels analysed indicate that white women are not less oppressed than Saudi women, they provide an Orientalist representation of Saudi Arabia as a fearful space. Finally, this thesis demonstrates that Alsanea is the only writer that provides Saudi self-representation. However, she falls into self-Orientalism by restricting her depiction of Saudi women to the social elite. This thesis sheds light on Western representations of women in Saudi Arabia, broadens the very limited number of feminist studies of Saudi women, paves the road for more studies of gender in Saudi Arabia and provides much-needed material for international scholars interested in investigating the lives of women in Saudi Arabia.
author2 Parker, Emma
author_facet Parker, Emma
Al-Harby, Nesreen Abdullah
author Al-Harby, Nesreen Abdullah
spellingShingle Al-Harby, Nesreen Abdullah
Veiled pearls : women in Saudi Arabia in contemporary fiction
author_sort Al-Harby, Nesreen Abdullah
title Veiled pearls : women in Saudi Arabia in contemporary fiction
title_short Veiled pearls : women in Saudi Arabia in contemporary fiction
title_full Veiled pearls : women in Saudi Arabia in contemporary fiction
title_fullStr Veiled pearls : women in Saudi Arabia in contemporary fiction
title_full_unstemmed Veiled pearls : women in Saudi Arabia in contemporary fiction
title_sort veiled pearls : women in saudi arabia in contemporary fiction
publisher University of Leicester
publishDate 2018
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.745864
work_keys_str_mv AT alharbynesreenabdullah veiledpearlswomeninsaudiarabiaincontemporaryfiction
_version_ 1718808825198280704