Biases in leadership perception : the role of implicit leadership theories, attachment style, attentional capacity, and accuracy motivation

Previous work suggested that followers’ insecure attachment style might bias the accuracy of follower leadership ratings (Davidovitz, Mikulincer, Shaver, Izsak, & Popper, 2007; Hansbrough, 2012), possibly also via followers’ implicit leadership theories (ILTs; Berson, Dan, & Yammarino, 2006;...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fox, Lena Franziska
Published: Durham University 2018
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.743183
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-743183
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7431832019-01-08T03:35:43ZBiases in leadership perception : the role of implicit leadership theories, attachment style, attentional capacity, and accuracy motivationFox, Lena Franziska2018Previous work suggested that followers’ insecure attachment style might bias the accuracy of follower leadership ratings (Davidovitz, Mikulincer, Shaver, Izsak, & Popper, 2007; Hansbrough, 2012), possibly also via followers’ implicit leadership theories (ILTs; Berson, Dan, & Yammarino, 2006; Keller, 2003). We argue that both followers’ attachment anxiety and avoidance—due to non-constructive emotion regulation and hence limited attentional capacity—lead to a biased leadership perception due to a greater usage of ILTs when rating a leader. In three online studies with full-time employed participants from the US and UK, we assessed both followers’ ILTs and leadership ratings together with their attachment style. Using an experimental design, Study 1 (N = 218) had participants rate a fictitious leader presented in a written vignette. In Study 2 (N = 217), participants rated their own supervisor. In Study 3 (N = 260), participants were asked to watch a video of a team meeting before rating the leader. Results indicated that the higher participants’ attachment avoidance, the more they relied on their ILTs when rating a leader. Study 3 found support suggesting that this was due to a decrease of attentional capacity. However, when under high working memory demands, the higher attachment avoidance, the less they relied on their ILTs, probably due to a breakdown of their defense-mechanism of blocking out information related to social perception (Edelstein & Gillath, 2008; Mikulincer, Dolev, & Shaver, 2004). Perceptual biases related to attachment anxiety were inconsistent. Results from Study 3 suggest that this might have been due to the interplay of a lack of attentional capacity and heightened accuracy motivation for participants high in attachment anxiety.Durham Universityhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.743183http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12569/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Previous work suggested that followers’ insecure attachment style might bias the accuracy of follower leadership ratings (Davidovitz, Mikulincer, Shaver, Izsak, & Popper, 2007; Hansbrough, 2012), possibly also via followers’ implicit leadership theories (ILTs; Berson, Dan, & Yammarino, 2006; Keller, 2003). We argue that both followers’ attachment anxiety and avoidance—due to non-constructive emotion regulation and hence limited attentional capacity—lead to a biased leadership perception due to a greater usage of ILTs when rating a leader. In three online studies with full-time employed participants from the US and UK, we assessed both followers’ ILTs and leadership ratings together with their attachment style. Using an experimental design, Study 1 (N = 218) had participants rate a fictitious leader presented in a written vignette. In Study 2 (N = 217), participants rated their own supervisor. In Study 3 (N = 260), participants were asked to watch a video of a team meeting before rating the leader. Results indicated that the higher participants’ attachment avoidance, the more they relied on their ILTs when rating a leader. Study 3 found support suggesting that this was due to a decrease of attentional capacity. However, when under high working memory demands, the higher attachment avoidance, the less they relied on their ILTs, probably due to a breakdown of their defense-mechanism of blocking out information related to social perception (Edelstein & Gillath, 2008; Mikulincer, Dolev, & Shaver, 2004). Perceptual biases related to attachment anxiety were inconsistent. Results from Study 3 suggest that this might have been due to the interplay of a lack of attentional capacity and heightened accuracy motivation for participants high in attachment anxiety.
author Fox, Lena Franziska
spellingShingle Fox, Lena Franziska
Biases in leadership perception : the role of implicit leadership theories, attachment style, attentional capacity, and accuracy motivation
author_facet Fox, Lena Franziska
author_sort Fox, Lena Franziska
title Biases in leadership perception : the role of implicit leadership theories, attachment style, attentional capacity, and accuracy motivation
title_short Biases in leadership perception : the role of implicit leadership theories, attachment style, attentional capacity, and accuracy motivation
title_full Biases in leadership perception : the role of implicit leadership theories, attachment style, attentional capacity, and accuracy motivation
title_fullStr Biases in leadership perception : the role of implicit leadership theories, attachment style, attentional capacity, and accuracy motivation
title_full_unstemmed Biases in leadership perception : the role of implicit leadership theories, attachment style, attentional capacity, and accuracy motivation
title_sort biases in leadership perception : the role of implicit leadership theories, attachment style, attentional capacity, and accuracy motivation
publisher Durham University
publishDate 2018
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.743183
work_keys_str_mv AT foxlenafranziska biasesinleadershipperceptiontheroleofimplicitleadershiptheoriesattachmentstyleattentionalcapacityandaccuracymotivation
_version_ 1718808491479531520