Anomaly handling : strategic flexibility in a complex problem-solving environment

This thesis aimed to develop a paradigm for the study of anomaly handling and to investigate the factors that influence success in detecting and classifying anomalies. A simulated anomaly-handling environment was created to mimic an intelligence analysis task in a security setting. A series of exper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leadley, Robert
Published: University of Sussex 2018
Subjects:
150
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.742159
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-742159
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7421592019-03-05T15:22:14ZAnomaly handling : strategic flexibility in a complex problem-solving environmentLeadley, Robert2018This thesis aimed to develop a paradigm for the study of anomaly handling and to investigate the factors that influence success in detecting and classifying anomalies. A simulated anomaly-handling environment was created to mimic an intelligence analysis task in a security setting. A series of experiments was designed to test hypotheses concerning sources of difficulty in detecting potential anomalies and making decisions about appropriate classifications of potentially anomalous events. Results across all experiments showed that complex problems, representing anomalies, were more difficult to solve than simple problems, and that this poor performance was consistent with the use of suboptimal strategies based on recognition of perceptual characteristics rather than inferences drawn from available data. Performance on complex problems was reduced still further when participants were exposed to trials that established a mental set. However, performance was improved when participants were given feedback on the correctness of their responses to each trial, which eliminated the negative effects of exposure to mental set. Another factor that impacted on successful decision-making was the cost of making errors. When participants were faced with a penalty for making incorrect decisions, solution rates improved compared with when performance was not related to reward. This has consequences for anomaly handling industries where the consequence of failure of often high. Unexpectedly, a number of the results indicated that there are situations where mental set may confer a benefit to decision making in a task of anomaly categorisation. Given the dominance of recognition-based strategies, it appears that mental set can refine the detection of perceptually relevant patterns, which can signal sudden changes in pattern that can lead to a switch from recognition-based to inferential task solution strategies. Overall, the merits for the use of simulated environments in critical decision making areas are discussed, and the contributory factors towards successful anomaly handling are analysed.150BF0176 Psychological tests and testingUniversity of Sussexhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.742159http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/75902/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 150
BF0176 Psychological tests and testing
spellingShingle 150
BF0176 Psychological tests and testing
Leadley, Robert
Anomaly handling : strategic flexibility in a complex problem-solving environment
description This thesis aimed to develop a paradigm for the study of anomaly handling and to investigate the factors that influence success in detecting and classifying anomalies. A simulated anomaly-handling environment was created to mimic an intelligence analysis task in a security setting. A series of experiments was designed to test hypotheses concerning sources of difficulty in detecting potential anomalies and making decisions about appropriate classifications of potentially anomalous events. Results across all experiments showed that complex problems, representing anomalies, were more difficult to solve than simple problems, and that this poor performance was consistent with the use of suboptimal strategies based on recognition of perceptual characteristics rather than inferences drawn from available data. Performance on complex problems was reduced still further when participants were exposed to trials that established a mental set. However, performance was improved when participants were given feedback on the correctness of their responses to each trial, which eliminated the negative effects of exposure to mental set. Another factor that impacted on successful decision-making was the cost of making errors. When participants were faced with a penalty for making incorrect decisions, solution rates improved compared with when performance was not related to reward. This has consequences for anomaly handling industries where the consequence of failure of often high. Unexpectedly, a number of the results indicated that there are situations where mental set may confer a benefit to decision making in a task of anomaly categorisation. Given the dominance of recognition-based strategies, it appears that mental set can refine the detection of perceptually relevant patterns, which can signal sudden changes in pattern that can lead to a switch from recognition-based to inferential task solution strategies. Overall, the merits for the use of simulated environments in critical decision making areas are discussed, and the contributory factors towards successful anomaly handling are analysed.
author Leadley, Robert
author_facet Leadley, Robert
author_sort Leadley, Robert
title Anomaly handling : strategic flexibility in a complex problem-solving environment
title_short Anomaly handling : strategic flexibility in a complex problem-solving environment
title_full Anomaly handling : strategic flexibility in a complex problem-solving environment
title_fullStr Anomaly handling : strategic flexibility in a complex problem-solving environment
title_full_unstemmed Anomaly handling : strategic flexibility in a complex problem-solving environment
title_sort anomaly handling : strategic flexibility in a complex problem-solving environment
publisher University of Sussex
publishDate 2018
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.742159
work_keys_str_mv AT leadleyrobert anomalyhandlingstrategicflexibilityinacomplexproblemsolvingenvironment
_version_ 1718992118195683328