Critique of journalistic reason : language and history in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin

This dissertation examines the significance of a theme that recurs throughout the work of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin but has remained largely overlooked: their preoccupation with journalism. I aim to show that the numerous reflections on journalism that punctuate their writings cannot be se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vandeputte, Thomas
Published: Goldsmiths College (University of London) 2017
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.732800
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-732800
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7328002018-07-18T03:13:52ZCritique of journalistic reason : language and history in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and BenjaminVandeputte, Thomas2017This dissertation examines the significance of a theme that recurs throughout the work of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin but has remained largely overlooked: their preoccupation with journalism. I aim to show that the numerous reflections on journalism that punctuate their writings cannot be separated from their philosophy ‘proper’. On the contrary: as I will argue, this preoccupation plays a pivotal role in the philosophical work of each of these thinkers – in particular their reflections on the philosophy of history. This pivotal role is best understood by examining the theme of journalism in the context of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin’s inquiries into the conditions and possibilities of historical experience. For each of the three thinkers discussed here, the structure of our experience of history is crystallised in an exemplary manner in the figures of the journalist and the newspaper reader. To understand the conditions under which historical experience becomes possible, so their reflections on the topic suggest, would require a study of journalism and its language, its subjective types and figures, its characteristic sense of time. As such, the figure of journalism will play a distinctly ambivalent role: for Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin alike, it will mark both the site of the breakdown of historical experience and of its possible renewal. Each of the thinkers discussed here will understand journalism as the exemplary expression of a collapse of the main categories of the philosophy of history after Hegel. At the same time, however, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin will treat journalism as a site from which a new experience of history may be wrested. As I will show, the images of market criers and angelic messengers, errant reports and rumours, pamphlets and ephemera that are scattered throughout their work can be seen to harbour the elements of a new conception of historical time and experience.Goldsmiths College (University of London)10.25602/GOLD.00022570http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.732800http://research.gold.ac.uk/22570/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description This dissertation examines the significance of a theme that recurs throughout the work of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin but has remained largely overlooked: their preoccupation with journalism. I aim to show that the numerous reflections on journalism that punctuate their writings cannot be separated from their philosophy ‘proper’. On the contrary: as I will argue, this preoccupation plays a pivotal role in the philosophical work of each of these thinkers – in particular their reflections on the philosophy of history. This pivotal role is best understood by examining the theme of journalism in the context of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin’s inquiries into the conditions and possibilities of historical experience. For each of the three thinkers discussed here, the structure of our experience of history is crystallised in an exemplary manner in the figures of the journalist and the newspaper reader. To understand the conditions under which historical experience becomes possible, so their reflections on the topic suggest, would require a study of journalism and its language, its subjective types and figures, its characteristic sense of time. As such, the figure of journalism will play a distinctly ambivalent role: for Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin alike, it will mark both the site of the breakdown of historical experience and of its possible renewal. Each of the thinkers discussed here will understand journalism as the exemplary expression of a collapse of the main categories of the philosophy of history after Hegel. At the same time, however, Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin will treat journalism as a site from which a new experience of history may be wrested. As I will show, the images of market criers and angelic messengers, errant reports and rumours, pamphlets and ephemera that are scattered throughout their work can be seen to harbour the elements of a new conception of historical time and experience.
author Vandeputte, Thomas
spellingShingle Vandeputte, Thomas
Critique of journalistic reason : language and history in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin
author_facet Vandeputte, Thomas
author_sort Vandeputte, Thomas
title Critique of journalistic reason : language and history in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin
title_short Critique of journalistic reason : language and history in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin
title_full Critique of journalistic reason : language and history in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin
title_fullStr Critique of journalistic reason : language and history in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin
title_full_unstemmed Critique of journalistic reason : language and history in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Benjamin
title_sort critique of journalistic reason : language and history in kierkegaard, nietzsche and benjamin
publisher Goldsmiths College (University of London)
publishDate 2017
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.732800
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeputtethomas critiqueofjournalisticreasonlanguageandhistoryinkierkegaardnietzscheandbenjamin
_version_ 1718712559406678016